Fix completion and validation issues in action.yml (#290)

Follow-up to https://github.com/actions/languageservices/pull/289

## What this fixes

**Autocomplete was broken inside composite action steps.** When you typed inside a step and triggered autocomplete, nothing showed up. Now you correctly get suggestions like run, uses, shell, etc.

**Duplicate error messages for missing required fields.** When a required field was missing (like main for Node.js actions), users saw two error messages - one generic schema validation error, and one custom error with a clear explanation. Now they only see the custom one.

For example, with using: node24 but no main:
- Before: Two errors shown
  - Schema: "There's not enough info to determine what you meant. Add one of these properties: args, entrypoint, image, main, ..."
  - Custom: "'main' is required for Node.js actions (using: node24)"
- After: Only the custom error is shown
This commit is contained in:
eric sciple
2026-01-07 08:42:59 -06:00
committed by GitHub
parent 2e46c66878
commit 78231482f5
4 changed files with 170 additions and 23 deletions
@@ -262,6 +262,29 @@ runs:
// It should have a sortText that makes it sort first
expect(usingCompletion?.sortText).toBe("0_using");
});
it("completes step keys inside composite action steps", async () => {
const [doc, position] = createActionDocument(`name: Test
description: Test
runs:
using: composite
steps:
- run: echo hello
shell: bash
- |`);
const completions = await complete(doc, position);
const labels = completions.map(c => c.label);
// Should show step keys, not filtered by runs-level logic
expect(labels).toContain("run");
expect(labels).toContain("uses");
expect(labels).toContain("shell");
expect(labels).toContain("id");
expect(labels).toContain("name");
expect(labels).toContain("if");
expect(labels).toContain("env");
expect(labels).toContain("working-directory");
});
});
describe("branding completions", () => {
+6 -14
View File
@@ -658,23 +658,15 @@ function filterActionRunsCompletions(values: Value[], path: TemplateToken[], roo
return values;
}
// Also verify we're completing at the runs level, not deeper (like inside steps)
// The runs mapping should be the last mapping in the path before the completion position
// or the path should only have root -> runs
let lastMappingIndex = -1;
for (let i = path.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
if (path[i] instanceof MappingToken) {
lastMappingIndex = i;
break;
}
}
if (lastMappingIndex === -1) {
// Find where runsMapping is in the path
const runsMappingIndex = path.indexOf(runsMapping);
if (runsMappingIndex === -1) {
return values;
}
// If the last mapping in path is not the runs mapping, we're nested deeper (e.g., inside steps)
const lastMapping = path[lastMappingIndex];
if (lastMapping !== runsMapping) {
// Check if there's anything after runsMapping in the path
// If so, we're nested deeper (e.g., inside steps sequence or a step mapping)
if (runsMappingIndex < path.length - 1) {
return values;
}
@@ -427,5 +427,104 @@ runs:
expect(diagnostics.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("main"))).toBe(true);
});
it("reports error for node24 action missing main", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - node24 without main
runs:
using: node24
pre: setup.js
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message === "'main' is required for Node.js actions (using: node24)")).toBe(true);
// Should NOT have duplicate schema error
expect(diagnostics.filter(d => d.message.includes("main")).length).toBe(1);
});
it("reports error for node24 action with only using (no narrowing key)", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - node24 without main
runs:
using: node24
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message === "'main' is required for Node.js actions (using: node24)")).toBe(true);
// Should NOT have the generic "not enough info" schema error
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("There's not enough info"))).toBe(false);
});
it("reports error for composite action missing steps", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - composite without steps
runs:
using: composite
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message === "'steps' is required for composite actions (using: composite)")).toBe(
true
);
// Should NOT have duplicate schema error
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("There's not enough info"))).toBe(false);
});
it("reports error for docker action missing image", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - docker without image
runs:
using: docker
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message === "'image' is required for Docker actions (using: docker)")).toBe(true);
// Should NOT have duplicate schema error
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("There's not enough info"))).toBe(false);
});
it("reports error for docker action with entrypoint but missing image", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - docker without image
runs:
using: docker
entrypoint: /entrypoint.sh
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message === "'image' is required for Docker actions (using: docker)")).toBe(true);
// Should NOT have duplicate "Required property is missing: image" schema error
expect(diagnostics.filter(d => d.message.includes("image")).length).toBe(1);
});
it("lets schema handle missing using", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - no using
runs:
main: index.js
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
// Should have schema error about not enough info or unexpected value
expect(diagnostics.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
// Should NOT have custom validation error (can't determine action type)
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("is required for"))).toBe(false);
});
it("lets schema handle invalid using value", async () => {
const doc = createActionDocument(`
name: My Action
description: Invalid - bad using value
runs:
using: not-supported
main: index.js
`);
const diagnostics = await validate(doc);
// Should have schema error about unexpected value
expect(diagnostics.length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
// Should NOT have custom validation error (unknown action type)
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("is required for"))).toBe(false);
expect(diagnostics.some(d => d.message.includes("is not valid for"))).toBe(false);
});
});
});
+42 -9
View File
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ import {ErrorPolicy} from "@actions/workflow-parser/model/convert";
import {MappingToken} from "@actions/workflow-parser/templates/tokens/mapping-token";
import {SequenceToken} from "@actions/workflow-parser/templates/tokens/sequence-token";
import {TemplateToken} from "@actions/workflow-parser/templates/tokens/template-token";
import {TemplateValidationError} from "@actions/workflow-parser/templates/template-validation-error";
import {File} from "@actions/workflow-parser/workflows/file";
import {TextDocument} from "vscode-languageserver-textdocument";
import {Diagnostic, DiagnosticSeverity} from "vscode-languageserver-types";
@@ -64,8 +65,16 @@ export async function validateAction(textDocument: TextDocument, config?: Valida
return [];
}
// Map parser errors to diagnostics
for (const err of result.context.errors.getErrors()) {
// Get schema errors
const schemaErrors = result.context.errors.getErrors();
// Run custom runs key validation, which also filters redundant schema errors in place
if (result.value) {
diagnostics.push(...validateRunsKeysAndFilterErrors(result.value, schemaErrors));
}
// Map remaining schema errors to diagnostics
for (const err of schemaErrors) {
const range = mapRange(err.range);
// Determine severity based on error type
@@ -83,12 +92,6 @@ export async function validateAction(textDocument: TextDocument, config?: Valida
});
}
// Validate runs key combinations based on using type
if (result.value) {
const runsKeyDiagnostics = validateRunsKeys(result.value);
diagnostics.push(...runsKeyDiagnostics);
}
// Validate composite action steps if we have a parsed result
if (result.value) {
const template = getOrConvertActionTemplate(result.context, result.value, textDocument.uri, {
@@ -137,8 +140,12 @@ function findStepsSequence(root: TemplateToken): SequenceToken | undefined {
/**
* Validates that the keys under `runs:` are valid for the specified `using:` type.
* Also filters out schema errors (in place) that this validation replaces with more specific messages.
*/
function validateRunsKeys(root: TemplateToken): Diagnostic[] {
function validateRunsKeysAndFilterErrors(
root: TemplateToken,
schemaErrors: TemplateValidationError[] // mutated: redundant errors are removed
): Diagnostic[] {
const diagnostics: Diagnostic[] = [];
// Find the runs mapping from the root
@@ -232,5 +239,31 @@ function validateRunsKeys(root: TemplateToken): Diagnostic[] {
}
}
// Remove schema errors that we're replacing with more specific messages (mutate in place)
for (let i = schemaErrors.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
const err = schemaErrors[i];
// Keep errors not at the runs section start
if (
err.range?.start.line !== runsMapping.range?.start.line ||
err.range?.start.column !== runsMapping.range?.start.column
) {
continue;
}
// Check if this is an error we're replacing
const isOneOfAmbiguity = err.rawMessage.startsWith("There's not enough info to determine");
const isRequiredKey = /^Required property is missing: (main|steps|image)$/.test(err.rawMessage);
if (!isOneOfAmbiguity && !isRequiredKey) {
continue; // Keep errors we're not replacing
}
// Remove only if we have custom diagnostics for this
if (diagnostics.length > 0) {
schemaErrors.splice(i, 1);
}
}
return diagnostics;
}