Glenn Maynard 7c70c416d8 At some point (1989), ISO-639 changed several language codes, after
the standard had already been released.  What's the point of having
standard language abbreviations if they're subject to change?

"Annex B" in ISO 639-1:2001 (over a decade later, if that's a year) says
"The changes were publicised, but they have not been included in printed
versions of ISO 639."  The first google hit for ISO-639 still makes no mention
of these changes (http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/iso639.htm).  That rules.

Remove "XS?"; as far as I can tell that's just an error in the "native language"
page.
2005-12-28 06:32:33 +00:00
S
Description
Languages
C++ 85.7%
Lua 4.3%
C 4.3%
Rich Text Format 2.3%
CMake 1.1%
Other 2%