itgmania212121

T

Glenn Maynard 4b1b3277e8 Singleton classes don't need to store their stuff in the class; put it in

the implementation: it's easier to edit without triggering huge rebuilds
that way.

(Hmm.  There's really no benefit, here, to using an anonymous namespace
instead of statics, but it seems better this way and I'm not sure why.
The normal admonitions against global variables don't apply here, since
static avoids namespace pollution and it's a singleton, but maybe it's
just habit asserting itself and anonymous namespaces circumvent that ...)

2005-07-22 05:38:56 +00:00

stepmania

Singleton classes don't need to store their stuff in the class; put it in

2005-07-22 05:38:56 +00:00