actions/itgmania212121
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix scaling glitch that could cause images to be slightly transparent

Browse Source 
when blitting bit depth up
This commit is contained in:
Glenn Maynard
2004-09-26 08:22:46 +00:00
parent f30127bcab
commit cc55c46033
1 changed files with 22 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
stepmania/src/RageSurfaceUtils.cpp
+22 -3
View File
@@ -553,10 +553,29 @@ static bool blit_rgba_to_rgba( const RageSurface *src_surf, const RageSurface *d
* lrintf( ((float) i / max_src_val) * max_dst_val )
* { 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3 }
*
* We use the first, since it gives the most even distribution.
* We use the first for increasing resolution, since it gives the most even
* distribution.
*
* 2->4 bit:
* SCALE( i, 0, max_src_val+1, 0, max_dst_val+1 );
* { 0, 4, 8, 12 }
* SCALE( i, 0, max_src_val, 0, max_dst_val );
* { 0, 5, 10, 15 }
* lrintf( ((float) i / max_src_val) * max_dst_val )
* { 0, 5, 10, 15 }
*
* The latter two are equivalent and give an even distribution; we use the
* second, since the first doesn't scale max_src_val to max_dst_val.
*
* Having separate formulas for increasing and decreasing resolution seems
* strange; what's wrong here?
*/
for( uint32_t i = 0; i <= max_src_val; ++i )
lookup[c][i] = (uint8_t) SCALE( i, 0, max_src_val+1, 0, max_dst_val+1 );
if( max_src_val > max_dst_val )
for( uint32_t i = 0; i <= max_src_val; ++i )
lookup[c][i] = (uint8_t) SCALE( i, 0, max_src_val+1, 0, max_dst_val+1 );
else
for( uint32_t i = 0; i <= max_src_val; ++i )
lookup[c][i] = (uint8_t) SCALE( i, 0, max_src_val, 0, max_dst_val );
}
}