Possible misnomer: Lifts aren't "taps".
I know, you can cycle to lifts as a tap type. I think we need a better naming scheme here.
This commit is contained in:
+2
-1
@@ -466,7 +466,8 @@ int NoteData::GetNumTapNotes( int iStartIndex, int iEndIndex ) const
|
|||||||
FOREACH_NONEMPTY_ROW_IN_TRACK_RANGE( *this, t, r, iStartIndex, iEndIndex )
|
FOREACH_NONEMPTY_ROW_IN_TRACK_RANGE( *this, t, r, iStartIndex, iEndIndex )
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
const TapNote &tn = GetTapNote(t, r);
|
const TapNote &tn = GetTapNote(t, r);
|
||||||
if( tn.type != TapNote::empty && tn.type != TapNote::mine && tn.type != TapNote::fake )
|
if( tn.type != TapNote::empty && tn.type != TapNote::mine
|
||||||
|
&& tn.type != TapNote::lift && tn.type != TapNote::fake )
|
||||||
iNumNotes++;
|
iNumNotes++;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user