From 06a6e9991ac0dd1446935671f1b65ba1a0e2a867 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Felds <jafelds@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:39:13 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Possible misnomer: Lifts aren't "taps".

I know, you can cycle to lifts as a tap type.

I think we need a better naming scheme here.
---
 src/NoteData.cpp | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/NoteData.cpp b/src/NoteData.cpp
index 88c350b408..eac5bc42b4 100644
--- a/src/NoteData.cpp
+++ b/src/NoteData.cpp
@@ -466,7 +466,8 @@ int NoteData::GetNumTapNotes( int iStartIndex, int iEndIndex ) const
 		FOREACH_NONEMPTY_ROW_IN_TRACK_RANGE( *this, t, r, iStartIndex, iEndIndex )
 		{
 			const TapNote &tn = GetTapNote(t, r);
-			if( tn.type != TapNote::empty  &&  tn.type != TapNote::mine  &&  tn.type != TapNote::fake )
+			if( tn.type != TapNote::empty && tn.type != TapNote::mine
+			   && tn.type != TapNote::lift && tn.type != TapNote::fake )
 				iNumNotes++;
 		}
 	}