Compare commits

..
Author SHA1 Message Date
Jon JanegoandGitHub b1c898035c Update summary.ts
correct max length
2024-09-03 11:45:57 -05:00
Jon JanegoandGitHub bb49ef985c Update main.ts 2024-09-03 11:43:30 -05:00
Jon JanegoandGitHub 431ce2fe42 Update summary.ts 2024-09-03 10:47:30 -05:00
33 changed files with 4825 additions and 109162 deletions
-11
View File
@@ -12,14 +12,3 @@ updates:
ignore:
- dependency-name: '@types/node'
update-types: ['version-update:semver-major']
groups:
minor-updates:
update-types:
- 'minor'
- 'patch'
exclude-patterns:
- '*spdx*'
# Pull out any updates to spdx definitions and parsing as a priority PR
spdx-licenses:
patterns:
- '*spdx*'
-3
View File
@@ -16,9 +16,6 @@ on:
- '**.md'
workflow_dispatch:
permissions:
contents: read
jobs:
check-dist:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-3
View File
@@ -10,9 +10,6 @@ on:
paths-ignore:
- '**.md'
permissions:
contents: read
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+2 -2
View File
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ jobs:
strategy:
fail-fast: false
matrix:
language: [ 'javascript-typescript', 'actions', 'ruby' ]
language: [ 'javascript-typescript' ]
steps:
- name: Checkout repository
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ jobs:
# For more details on CodeQL's query packs, refer to: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/automatically-scanning-your-code-for-vulnerabilities-and-errors/configuring-code-scanning#using-queries-in-ql-packs
# queries: security-extended,security-and-quality
config: |
paths-ignore:
paths-ignore:
- dist/index.js
- dist/sourcemap-register.js
+1 -2
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
name: 'Dependency Review'
on: [pull_request]
permissions:
@@ -12,4 +11,4 @@ jobs:
- name: 'Checkout Repository'
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Dependency Review
uses: ./
uses: actions/dependency-review-action@main
+2 -5
View File
@@ -12,15 +12,12 @@ jobs:
stale:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/stale@v9.1.0
- uses: actions/stale@v9.0.0
name: Clean up stale PRs and Issues
with:
stale-pr-message: "👋 This pull request has been marked as stale because it has been open with no activity for 180 days. You can: comment on the PR or remove the stale label to hold stalebot off for a while, add the `Keep` label to hold stale off permanently, or do nothing. If you do nothing, this pull request will be closed eventually by the stalebot. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more policy details."
stale-pr-message: "👋 This pull request has been marked as stale because it has been open with no activity. You can: comment on the issue or remove the stale label to hold stale off for a while, add the `Keep` label to hold stale off permanently, or do nothing. If you do nothing, this pull request will be closed eventually by the stale bot. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more policy details."
stale-pr-label: "Stale"
close-pr-message: "👋 This pull request has been closed by stalebot because it has been open with no activity for over 180 days. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more policy details."
stale-issue-label: "Stale"
stale-issue-message: "👋 This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open with no activity for 180 days. You can: comment on the issue or remove the stale label to hold stalebot off for a while, add the `Keep` label to hold stale off permanently, or do nothing. If you do nothing, this issue will be closed eventually by the stalebot. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more policy details."
close-issue-message: "👋 This issue has been closed by stalebot because it has been open with no activity for over 180 days. Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more policy details."
exempt-pr-labels: "Keep" # a "Keep" label will keep the PR from being closed as stale
exempt-issue-labels: "Keep" # a "Keep" label will keep the issue from being closed as stale
days-before-pr-stale: 180 # when the PR is considered stale
+3 -3
View File
@@ -35,11 +35,11 @@ Ready to contribute to `dependency-review-action`? Here is some information to
This action makes an authenticated query to the [Dependency Review API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/dependency-graph/dependency-review) endpoint (`GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependency-graph/compare/{basehead}`) to find out the set of added and removed dependencies for each manifest.
The action then evaluates the differences between the pushes based on the rules defined in the action configuration, and summarizes the differences and any violations of the rules you have defined as a comment in the pull request that triggered it and the action outputs.
The action then evaluates the differences between the pushes based on the the rules defined in the action configuration, and summarizes the differences and any violations of the rules you have defined as a comment in the pull request that triggered it and the action outputs.
### Local Development
Before you begin, you need to have [Node.js](https://nodejs.org/en/) installed, minimum version 20.
Before you begin, you need to have [Node.js](https://nodejs.org/en/) installed, minimum version 18.
#### Bootstrapping the project
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ $ GITHUB_TOKEN=<token> ./scripts/scan_pr --config-file my_custom_config.yml <pr_
npm run test
```
_Note_: We don't have a very comprehensive test suite, so any contributions to the existing tests are welcome!
_Note_: We don't a very comprehensive test suite, so any contributions to the existing tests are welcome!
### Submitting a pull request
+60 -83
View File
@@ -1,48 +1,37 @@
# dependency-review-action
- [dependency-review-action](#dependency-review-action)
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Viewing the results](#viewing-the-results)
- [Installation](#installation)
- [Installation (standard)](#installation-standard)
- [Installation (GitHub Enterprise Server)](#installation-github-enterprise-server)
- [Configuration](#configuration)
- [Configuration options](#configuration-options)
- [Configuration methods](#configuration-methods)
- [Option 1: Using inline configuration](#option-1-using-inline-configuration)
- [Option 2: Using an external configuration file](#option-2-using-an-external-configuration-file)
- [`OTHER` in license strings](#other-in-license-strings)
- [Further information](#further-information)
- [Using dependency review action to block a pull request from being merged](#using-dependency-review-action-to-block-a-pull-request-from-being-merged)
- [Outputs](#outputs)
- [Getting help](#getting-help)
- [Contributing](#contributing)
- [License](#license)
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Installation](#installation)
- [Configuration](#configuration)
- [Using dependency review action to block a pull request from being merged](#using-dependency-review-action-to-block-a-pull-request-from-being-merged)
- [Outputs](#outputs)
- [Getting help](#getting-help)
- [Contributing](#contributing)
- [License](#license)
## Overview
The dependency review action scans your pull requests for dependency changes, and will raise an error if any vulnerabilities or invalid licenses are being introduced.
The dependency review action scans your pull requests for dependency changes, and will raise an error if any vulnerabilities or invalid licenses are being introduced.
The action is supported by an [API endpoint](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/dependency-graph/dependency-review?apiVersion=2022-11-28) that diffs the dependencies between any two revisions on your default branch.
The action is available for:
The action is available for:
- Public repositories
- Private repositories with a [GitHub Advanced Security](https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/get-started/learning-about-github/about-github-advanced-security) license.
### Viewing the results
When the action runs, you can see the results on:
When the action runs, you can see the results on:
- The **job logs** page.
1. Go to the **Actions** tab for the repository and select the relevant workflow run.
- The **job logs** page.
1. Go to the **Actions** tab for the repository and select the relevant workflow run.
1. Then under "Jobs", click **dependency review**.
<img width="850" alt="GitHub workflow run log showing Dependency Review job output" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2161/161042286-b22d7dd3-13cb-458d-8744-ce70ed9bf562.png">
<img width="850" alt="GitHub workflow run log showing Dependency Review job output" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2161/161042286-b22d7dd3-13cb-458d-8744-ce70ed9bf562.png">
- The **job summary** page.
1. Go to the **Actions** tab for the repository and select the relevant workflow run.
1. Click **Summary**, then scroll to "dependency-review summary".
1. Go to the **Actions** tab for the repository and select the relevant workflow run.
1. Click **Summary**, then scroll to "dependency-review summary".
<img width="850" alt="GitHub job summary showing Dependency Review output" src="https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/assets/2161/42fbed1d-64a7-42bf-9b05-c416bc67493f">
## Installation
@@ -52,7 +41,7 @@ When the action runs, you can see the results on:
#### Installation (standard)
You can install the action on any public repository, or any organization-owned private repository, provided the organization has a GitHub Advanced Security license.
You can install the action on any public repository, or any organization-owned private repository, provided the organization has a GitHub Advanced Security license.
1. Add a new YAML workflow to your `.github/workflows` folder:
@@ -75,13 +64,13 @@ You can install the action on any public repository, or any organization-owned p
#### Installation (GitHub Enterprise Server)
You can install the action on repositories on GitHub Enterprise Server.
You can install the action on repositories on GitHub Enterprise Server.
1. Ensure [GitHub Advanced Security](https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@latest/admin/code-security/managing-github-advanced-security-for-your-enterprise/enabling-github-advanced-security-for-your-enterprise) and [GitHub Connect](https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-server@latest/admin/github-actions/managing-access-to-actions-from-githubcom/enabling-automatic-access-to-githubcom-actions-using-github-connect) are enabled for the enterprise.
2. Ensure you have installed the [dependency-review-action](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action) on the server.
3. Add a new YAML workflow to your `.github/workflows` folder:
```yaml
``` yaml
name: 'Dependency Review'
on: [pull_request]
@@ -97,8 +86,7 @@ You can install the action on repositories on GitHub Enterprise Server.
- name: 'Dependency Review'
uses: actions/dependency-review-action@v4
```
4. In the workflow file, replace the `runs-on` value with the label of any of your runners. (The default value is `self-hosted`.)
5. In the workflow file, replace the `runs-on` value with the label of any of your runners. (The default value is `self-hosted`.)
## Configuration
@@ -109,30 +97,29 @@ You can install the action on repositories on GitHub Enterprise Server.
There are various configuration options you can use to specify settings for the dependency review action.
All configuration options are optional.
All configuration options are optional.
| Option | Usage | Possible values | Default value |
| -------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------- |
| `fail-on-severity` | Defines the threshold for the level of severity. The action will fail on any pull requests that introduce vulnerabilities of the specified severity level or higher. | `low`, `moderate`, `high`, `critical` | `low` |
| `allow-licenses`\* | Contains a list of allowed licenses. The action will fail on pull requests that introduce dependencies with licenses that do not match the list. | Any [SPDX-compliant identifier(s)](https://spdx.org/licenses/) | none |
| `deny-licenses`\* | ⚠️ This option is deprecated for possible removal in the next major release. See [Deprecate the deny-licenses option #938](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/issues/938) for more information. <br> Contains a list of prohibited licenses. The action will fail on pull requests that introduce dependencies with licenses that match the list. | Any [SPDX-compliant identifier(s)](https://spdx.org/licenses/) | none |
| `fail-on-scopes` | Contains a list of strings of the build environments you want to support. The action will fail on pull requests that introduce vulnerabilities in the scopes that match the list. | `runtime`, `development`, `unknown` | `runtime` |
| `allow-ghsas` | Contains a list of GitHub Advisory Database IDs that can be skipped during detection. | Any GHSAs from the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://github.com/advisories) | none |
| `license-check` | Enable or disable the license check performed by the action. | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| `vulnerability-check` | Enable or disable the vulnerability check performed by the action. | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| `allow-dependencies-licenses`\* | Contains a list of packages that will be excluded from license checks. | Any package(s) in [purl](https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec) format | none |
| `base-ref`/`head-ref` | Provide custom git references for the git base/head when performing the comparison check. This is only used for event types other than `pull_request` and `pull_request_target`. | Any valid git ref(s) in your project | none |
| `comment-summary-in-pr` | Enable or disable reporting the review summary as a comment in the pull request. If enabled, you must give the workflow or job the `pull-requests: write` permission. With each execution, a new comment will overwrite the existing one. | `always`, `on-failure`, `never` | `never` |
| `deny-packages` | Any number of packages to block in a PR. This option will match on the exact version provided. If no version is provided, the option will treat the specified package as a wildcard and deny all versions. | Package(s) in [purl](https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec) format | empty |
| `deny-groups` | Any number of groups (namespaces) to block in a PR. | Namespace(s) in [purl](https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec) format (no package name, no version number) | empty |
| `retry-on-snapshot-warnings`\* | Enable or disable retrying the action every 10 seconds while waiting for dependency submission actions to complete. | `true`, `false` | `false` |
| `retry-on-snapshot-warnings-timeout`\* | Maximum amount of time (in seconds) to retry the action while waiting for dependency submission actions to complete. | Any positive integer | 120 |
| `warn-only`+ | When set to `true`, the action will log all vulnerabilities as warnings regardless of the severity, and the action will complete with a `success` status. This overrides the `fail-on-severity` option. | `true`, `false` | `false` |
| `show-openssf-scorecard` | When set to `true`, the action will output information about all the known OpenSSF Scorecard scores for the dependencies changed in this pull request. | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| `warn-on-openssf-scorecard-level` | When `show-openssf-scorecard-levels` is set to `true`, this option lets you configure the threshold for when a score is considered too low and gets a :warning: warning in the CI. | Any positive integer | 3 |
| Option | Usage | Possible values | Default value |
| -------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------- |
| `fail-on-severity` | Defines the threshold for the level of severity. The action will fail on any pull requests that introduce vulnerabilities of the specified severity level or higher. | `low`, `moderate`, `high`, `critical` | `low` |
| `allow-licenses`\* | Contains a list of allowed licenses. The action will fail on pull requests that introduce dependencies with licenses that do not match the list. | Any [SPDX-compliant identifier(s)](https://spdx.org/licenses/) | none |
| `deny-licenses`\* | Contains a list of prohibited licenses. The action will fail on pull requests that introduce dependencies with licenses that match the list. | Any [SPDX-compliant identifier(s)](https://spdx.org/licenses/) | none |
| `fail-on-scopes` | Contains a list of strings of the build environments you want to support. The action will fail on pull requests that introduce vulnerabilities in the scopes that match the list. | `runtime`, `development`, `unknown` | `runtime` |
| `allow-ghsas` | Contains a list of GitHub Advisory Database IDs that can be skipped during detection. | Any GHSAs from the [GitHub Advisory Database](https://github.com/advisories) | none |
| `license-check` | Enable or disable the license check performed by the action. | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| `vulnerability-check` | Enable or disable the vulnerability check performed by the action. | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| `allow-dependencies-licenses`\* | Contains a list of packages that will be excluded from license checks. | Any package(s) in [purl](https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec) format | none |
| `base-ref`/`head-ref` | Provide custom git references for the git base/head when performing the comparison check. This is only used for event types other than `pull_request` and `pull_request_target`. | Any valid git ref(s) in your project | none |
| `comment-summary-in-pr` | Enable or disable reporting the review summary as a comment in the pull request. If enabled, you must give the workflow or job the `pull-requests: write` permission. | `always`, `on-failure`, `never` | `never` |
| `deny-packages` | Any number of packages to block in a PR. This option will match on the exact version provided. If no version is provided, the option will treat the specified package as a wildcard and deny all versions. | Package(s) in [purl](https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec) format | empty |
| `deny-groups` | Any number of groups (namespaces) to block in a PR. | Namespace(s) in [purl](https://github.com/package-url/purl-spec) format (no package name, no version number) | empty |
| `retry-on-snapshot-warnings`\* | Enable or disable retrying the action every 10 seconds while waiting for dependency submission actions to complete. | `true`, `false` | `false` |
| `retry-on-snapshot-warnings-timeout`\* | Maximum amount of time (in seconds) to retry the action while waiting for dependency submission actions to complete. | Any positive integer | 120 |
| `warn-only`+ | When set to `true`, the action will log all vulnerabilities as warnings regardless of the severity, and the action will complete with a `success` status. This overrides the `fail-on-severity` option. | `true`, `false` | `false` |
| `show-openssf-scorecard` | When set to `true`, the action will output information about all the known OpenSSF Scorecard scores for the dependencies changed in this pull request. | `true`, `false` | `true` |
| `warn-on-openssf-scorecard-level` | When `show-openssf-scorecard-levels` is set to `true`, this option lets you configure the threshold for when a score is considered too low and gets a :warning: warning in the CI. | Any positive integer | 3 |
> [!NOTE]
>
> - \* Not supported for use with GitHub Enterprise Server. (Checking for licenses is not supported on GitHub Enterprise Server because the API does not return license information.)
> - \+ When `warn-only` is set to `true`, all vulnerabilities, independently of the severity, will be reported as warnings and the action will not fail.
> - The `allow-licenses` and `deny-licenses` options are mutually exclusive; an error will be raised if you provide both.
@@ -141,7 +128,6 @@ All configuration options are optional.
### Configuration methods
To specify settings for the dependency review action, you can choose from two options:
- [Option 1: Inline the configuration options]() in your workflow file.
- [Option 2: Reference an external configuration file]() in your workflow file.
@@ -150,7 +136,6 @@ To specify settings for the dependency review action, you can choose from two op
You can pass configuration options to the dependency review action using your workflow file.
1. In the same YAML workflow file you created during installation, use the `with:` key to specify your chosen settings:
```yaml
name: 'Dependency Review'
on: [pull_request]
@@ -173,7 +158,7 @@ You can pass configuration options to the dependency review action using your wo
#### Option 2: Using an external configuration file
You can use an external configuration file to specify settings for this action. The file can be a local file or a file in an external repository.
You can use an external configuration file to specify settings for this action. The file can be a local file or a file in an external repository.
1. In the same YAML workflow file you created during installation, use `config-file` to specify that you are using an external configuration file.
@@ -193,42 +178,34 @@ You can use an external configuration file to specify settings for this action.
with:
config-file: './.github/dependency-review-config.yml'
```
| Option | Usage | Possible values |
| ------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| `config-file` | A path to a file in the current repository or an external repository. Use this syntax for external files: `OWNER/REPOSITORY/FILENAME@BRANCH` | **Local file**: `./.github/dependency-review-config.yml` <br> **External repo**: `github/octorepo/dependency-review-config.yml@main` |
| Option | Usage | Possible values |
|--------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------- |
| `config-file` | A path to a file in the current repository or an external repository. Use this syntax for external files: `OWNER/REPOSITORY/FILENAME@BRANCH` | **Local file**: `./.github/dependency-review-config.yml` <br> **External repo**: `github/octorepo/dependency-review-config.yml@main` |
2. Optionally, if the file resides in a private external repository, and for all GitHub Enterprise Server repositories, use `external-repo-token` to specify a token for fetching the file.
```yaml
- name: Dependency Review
uses: actions/dependency-review-action@v4
with:
config-file: 'github/octorepo/dependency-review-config.yml@main'
external-repo-token: 'ghp_123456789abcde'
- name: Dependency Review
uses: actions/dependency-review-action@v4
with:
config-file: 'github/octorepo/dependency-review-config.yml@main'
external-repo-token: 'ghp_123456789abcde'
```
| Option | Usage | Possible values |
| --------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| Option | Usage | Possible values |
|--------------------- | ----------- | ----------------------------- |
| `external-repo-token` | Specifies a token for fetching the configuration file. It is required if the file resides in a private external repository and for all GitHub Enterprise Server repositories. Create a token in [developer settings](https://github.com/settings/tokens). | Any token with `read` permissions to the repository hosting the config file. |
3. Create the configuration file in the path you specified for `config-file`.
4. In the configuration file, specify your chosen settings.
```yaml
fail-on-severity: 'critical'
allow-licenses:
fail_on_severity: 'critical'
allow_licenses:
- 'GPL-3.0'
- 'BSD-3-Clause'
- 'MIT'
```
#### `OTHER` in license strings
License data comes from [ClearlyDefined](https://clearlydefined.io) and you may sometimes see licenses displayed with the string `OTHER` in them. ClearlyDefined [defines OTHER](https://docs.clearlydefined.io/docs/curation/curation-guidelines) as:
> This indicates that a human confirmed that there is license information in the file but that the license is not an SPDX-identified license.
`OTHER` is not a valid [SPDX license identifier](https://spdx.org/licenses/), so we convert `OTHER` in a license string into `LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER`, which _is_ valid in SPDX. If you want to add that to the deny or allow list, be sure to add `LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER` to this list, because that is what we'll actually be comparing.
> [!NOTE]
> For external configuration files, the option names use underscores instead of dashes.
> Example: `fail_on_severity`
#### Further information
@@ -237,7 +214,7 @@ License data comes from [ClearlyDefined](https://clearlydefined.io) and you may
## Using dependency review action to block a pull request from being merged
You can configure your repository to block a pull request from being merged if the pull request fails the dependency review action check. To do this, the repository owner must configure branch protection settings that require the check to pass before merging. For more information, see "[Require status checks before merging](https://docs.github.com/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/about-protected-branches#require-status-checks-before-merging)" in GitHub Docs documentation.
You can configure your repository to block a pull request from being merged if the pull request fails the dependency review action check. To do this, the repository owner must configure branch protection settings that require the check to pass before merging. For more information, see "[Require status checks before merging](https://docs.github.com/repositories/configuring-branches-and-merges-in-your-repository/defining-the-mergeability-of-pull-requests/about-protected-branches#require-status-checks-before-merging)" in GitHub Docs documentation.
## Outputs
@@ -250,7 +227,7 @@ Dependency review action can create [outputs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions
- `denied-changes` holds information about denied dependency changes in a JSON format.
> [!NOTE]
> Action outputs are unicode strings [with a 1MB size limit](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions/metadata-syntax-for-github-actions#outputs-for-docker-container-and-javascript-actions).
> Action outputs are unicode strings [with a 1MB size limit](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/creating-actions/metadata-syntax-for-github-actions#outputs-for-docker-container-and-javascript-actions).
>
> If you use these outputs in a run-step, you must store the output data in an environment variable instead of using the output directly. Using an output directly might break shell scripts. For example:
>
@@ -261,7 +238,7 @@ Dependency review action can create [outputs](https://docs.github.com/en/actions
> echo "$VULNERABLE_CHANGES" | jq
> ```
>
> instead of direct `echo '${{ steps.review.outputs.vulnerable-changes }}'`.
> instead of direct `echo '${{ steps.review.outputs.vulnerable-changes }}'`.
> See [examples](docs/examples.md) for more.
## Getting help
+6 -33
View File
@@ -124,7 +124,11 @@ test('it raises an error when no refs are provided and the event is not a pull r
).toThrow()
})
const pullRequestLikeEvents = ['pull_request', 'pull_request_target']
const pullRequestLikeEvents = [
'pull_request',
'pull_request_target',
'merge_group'
]
test.each(pullRequestLikeEvents)(
'it uses the given refs even when the event is %s',
@@ -148,7 +152,7 @@ test.each(pullRequestLikeEvents)(
)
test.each(pullRequestLikeEvents)(
'it uses the event refs when the event is %s and no refs are provided in config',
'it uses the event refs when the event is %s and the no refs are input',
async eventName => {
const refs = getRefs(await readConfig(), {
payload: {
@@ -165,37 +169,6 @@ test.each(pullRequestLikeEvents)(
}
)
test('it uses the given refs even when the event is merge_group', async () => {
setInput('base-ref', 'a-custom-base-ref')
setInput('head-ref', 'a-custom-head-ref')
const refs = getRefs(await readConfig(), {
payload: {
merge_group: {
base_sha: 'pr-base-ref',
head_sha: 'pr-head-ref'
}
},
eventName: 'merge_group'
})
expect(refs.base).toEqual('a-custom-base-ref')
expect(refs.head).toEqual('a-custom-head-ref')
})
test('it uses the event refs when the event is merge_group and no refs are provided in config', async () => {
const refs = getRefs(await readConfig(), {
payload: {
merge_group: {
base_sha: 'pr-base-ref',
head_sha: 'pr-head-ref'
}
},
eventName: 'merge_group'
})
expect(refs.base).toEqual('pr-base-ref')
expect(refs.head).toEqual('pr-head-ref')
})
test('it defaults to runtime scope', async () => {
const config = await readConfig()
expect(config.fail_on_scopes).toEqual(['runtime'])
-59
View File
@@ -134,62 +134,3 @@ test('allows packages not defined in the deny packages and groups list', async (
expect(deniedChanges.length).toEqual(0)
})
test('deny packages does not prevent removal of denied packages', async () => {
const changes: Changes = [
createTestChange({
change_type: 'added',
name: 'deny-by-name-and-version',
version: '1.0.0',
ecosystem: 'npm'
}),
createTestChange({
change_type: 'removed',
name: 'pass-by-name-and-version',
version: '1.0.0',
ecosystem: 'npm'
}),
createTestChange({
change_type: 'added',
name: 'deny-by-name',
version: '1.0.0',
ecosystem: 'npm'
}),
createTestChange({
change_type: 'removed',
name: 'pass-by-name',
version: '1.0.0',
ecosystem: 'npm'
}),
createTestChange({
change_type: 'added',
package_url: 'pkg:npm/org.test.deny.by.namespace/[email protected]',
ecosystem: 'npm'
}),
createTestChange({
change_type: 'removed',
package_url: 'pkg:npm/org.test.pass.by.namespace/[email protected]',
ecosystem: 'npm'
})
]
const deniedPackages = createTestPURLs([
'pkg:npm/org.test.deny.by/[email protected]',
'pkg:npm/org.test.pass.by/[email protected]',
'pkg:npm/org.test.deny.by/deny-by-name',
'pkg:npm/org.test.pass.by/pass-by-name'
])
const deniedGroups = createTestPURLs([
'pkg:npm/org.test.deny.by.namespace/',
'pkg:npm/org.test.pass.by.namespace/'
])
const deniedChanges = await getDeniedChanges(
changes,
deniedPackages,
deniedGroups
)
expect(deniedChanges.length).toEqual(3)
expect(deniedChanges[0]).toBe(changes[0])
expect(deniedChanges[1]).toBe(changes[2])
expect(deniedChanges[2]).toBe(changes[4])
})
-99
View File
@@ -74,46 +74,6 @@ const pipChange: Change = {
]
}
const complexLicenseChange: Change = {
change_type: 'added',
manifest: 'requirements.txt',
ecosystem: 'pip',
name: 'package-1',
version: '1.1.1',
package_url: 'pkg:pypi/[email protected]',
license: 'MIT AND Apache-2.0',
source_repository_url: 'github.com/some-repo',
scope: 'runtime',
vulnerabilities: [
{
severity: 'moderate',
advisory_ghsa_id: 'second-random_string',
advisory_summary: 'not so dangerous',
advisory_url: 'github.com/future-funk'
},
{
severity: 'low',
advisory_ghsa_id: 'third-random_string',
advisory_summary: 'dont page me',
advisory_url: 'github.com/future-funk'
}
]
}
const unlicensedChange: Change = {
change_type: 'added',
manifest: '.github/workflows/ci.yml',
ecosystem: 'actions',
name: 'foo-org/actions-repo/.github/workflows/some-action.yml',
version: '1.1.1',
package_url:
'pkg:githubactions/foo-org/actions-repo/.github/workflows/[email protected]',
license: null,
source_repository_url: 'github.com/some-repo',
scope: 'development',
vulnerabilities: []
}
jest.mock('@actions/core')
const mockOctokit = {
@@ -169,30 +129,6 @@ test('it adds license inside the deny list to forbidden changes', async () => {
expect(forbidden.length).toEqual(1)
})
test('it handles allowed complex licenses', async () => {
const changes: Changes = [
complexLicenseChange // MIT AND Apache-2.0 license
]
const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
allow: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
})
expect(forbidden.length).toEqual(0)
})
test('it handles complex licenses not all on the allow list', async () => {
const changes: Changes = [
complexLicenseChange // MIT AND Apache-2.0 license
]
const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
allow: ['MIT']
})
expect(forbidden.length).toEqual(1)
})
test('it does not add license outside the allow list to forbidden changes if it is in removed changes', async () => {
const changes: Changes = [
{...npmChange, change_type: 'removed'},
@@ -290,19 +226,6 @@ test('it does filters out changes if they are not on the exclusions list', async
expect(invalidLicenses.forbidden[1]).toBe(npmChange)
})
test('it does not fail if there is a license expression in the allow list', async () => {
const changes: Changes = [
{...npmChange, license: 'MIT AND Apache-2.0'},
{...rubyChange, license: 'BSD-3-Clause'}
]
const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
allow: ['BSD-3-Clause', 'MIT AND Apache-2.0', 'MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
})
expect(forbidden.length).toEqual(0)
})
describe('GH License API fallback', () => {
test('it calls licenses endpoint if atleast one of the changes has null license and valid source_repository_url', async () => {
const nullLicenseChange = {
@@ -340,26 +263,4 @@ describe('GH License API fallback', () => {
expect(mockOctokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(unlicensed.length).toEqual(0)
})
test('it does not call licenses API if the package is excluded', async () => {
const {unlicensed} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges([unlicensedChange], {
licenseExclusions: [
'pkg:githubactions/foo-org/actions-repo/.github/workflows/some-action.yml'
]
})
expect(mockOctokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(unlicensed.length).toEqual(0)
})
test('it checks namespaces when doing exclusions', async () => {
const {unlicensed} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges([unlicensedChange], {
licenseExclusions: [
'pkg:githubactions/bar-org/actions-repo/.github/workflows/some-action.yml'
]
})
expect(mockOctokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(unlicensed.length).toEqual(1)
})
})
-153
View File
@@ -1,153 +0,0 @@
import {
afterEach,
beforeEach,
describe,
expect,
jest,
test
} from '@jest/globals'
import * as fs from 'fs'
import * as core from '@actions/core'
import {DefaultArtifactClient} from '@actions/artifact'
import type {SpyInstance} from 'jest-mock'
import {handleLargeSummary} from '../src/main'
jest.mock('ansi-styles', () => ({
__esModule: true,
default: {
color: {
red: {open: '', close: ''},
yellow: {open: '', close: ''},
grey: {open: '', close: ''},
green: {open: '', close: ''}
},
bold: {open: '', close: ''}
}
}))
jest.mock('../src/dependency-graph', () => ({}))
jest.mock('@actions/core', () => {
const summary = {
addRaw: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addHeading: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addTable: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addSeparator: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addImage: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addList: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addBreak: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addLink: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addDetails: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addSection: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addCodeBlock: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addFields: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
addEol: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(),
write: jest.fn(async () => undefined),
emptyBuffer: jest.fn(),
stringify: jest.fn(() => '')
}
return {
__esModule: true,
getInput: jest.fn((name: string) =>
name === 'repo-token' ? 'gh_test_token' : ''
),
setOutput: jest.fn(),
setFailed: jest.fn(),
warning: jest.fn(),
info: jest.fn(),
debug: jest.fn(),
startGroup: jest.fn(),
endGroup: jest.fn(),
group: jest.fn(async (_name: string, fn: () => Promise<unknown>) => fn()),
summary
}
})
jest.mock('@actions/artifact', () => ({
DefaultArtifactClient: jest.fn()
}))
const ORIGINAL_ENV = {...process.env}
type ArtifactClientInstance = {
uploadArtifact: jest.Mock
}
const DefaultArtifactClientMock = DefaultArtifactClient as unknown as jest.Mock
const createArtifactClient = (): ArtifactClientInstance => ({
uploadArtifact: jest.fn(async () => undefined)
})
describe('handleLargeSummary', () => {
let writeFileSpy: SpyInstance<typeof fs.promises.writeFile>
beforeEach(() => {
process.env = {...ORIGINAL_ENV}
writeFileSpy = jest
.spyOn(fs.promises, 'writeFile')
.mockImplementation(async () => undefined)
DefaultArtifactClientMock.mockClear()
DefaultArtifactClientMock.mockImplementation(() => createArtifactClient())
})
afterEach(() => {
writeFileSpy.mockRestore()
jest.clearAllMocks()
process.env = {...ORIGINAL_ENV}
})
test('returns original summary when under size threshold', async () => {
const summaryContent = 'short summary'
const result = await handleLargeSummary(summaryContent)
expect(result).toBe(summaryContent)
expect(writeFileSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
expect(DefaultArtifactClientMock).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
})
test('uploads artifact and returns minimal summary when summary is too large', async () => {
process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL = 'https://github.com'
process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY = 'owner/repo'
process.env.GITHUB_RUN_ID = '12345'
const largeSummary = 'a'.repeat(1024 * 1024 + 1)
const result = await handleLargeSummary(largeSummary)
expect(writeFileSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
expect(writeFileSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith('summary.md', largeSummary)
expect(DefaultArtifactClientMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
const artifactInstance = DefaultArtifactClientMock.mock.results[0]
?.value as ArtifactClientInstance
expect(artifactInstance.uploadArtifact).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'dependency-review-summary',
['summary.md'],
'.',
{retentionDays: 1}
)
expect(result).toContain('# Dependency Review Summary')
expect(result).toContain('dependency-review-summary')
expect(result).toContain('actions/runs/12345')
})
test('returns original summary and logs a warning when artifact handling fails', async () => {
const warningMock = core.warning as jest.Mock
warningMock.mockClear()
const largeSummary = 'b'.repeat(1024 * 1024 + 1)
DefaultArtifactClientMock.mockImplementation(() => ({
uploadArtifact: jest.fn(async () => {
throw new Error('upload failed')
})
}))
const result = await handleLargeSummary(largeSummary)
expect(result).toBe(largeSummary)
expect(warningMock).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
expect.stringContaining('Failed to handle large summary')
)
})
})
+16 -85
View File
@@ -55,16 +55,6 @@ describe('satisfiesAny', () => {
candidate: 'MIT OR ISC',
licenses: ['MiT'],
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND OTHER',
licenses: ['MIT'],
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR OTHER',
licenses: ['MIT', 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'],
expected: true
}
]
@@ -140,16 +130,6 @@ describe('satisfiesAll', () => {
candidate: 'MIT OR ISC',
licenses: ['MiT'],
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND OTHER',
licenses: ['MIT'],
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND OTHER',
licenses: ['MIT', 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'],
expected: true
}
]
@@ -165,47 +145,47 @@ describe('satisfies', () => {
const units = [
{
candidate: 'MIT',
allowList: ['MIT'],
constraint: 'MIT',
expected: true
},
{
candidate: 'Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['MIT'],
constraint: 'MIT',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['MIT'],
constraint: 'MIT',
expected: true
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['Apache-2.0'],
constraint: 'Apache-2.0',
expected: true
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['BSD-3-Clause'],
constraint: 'BSD-3-Clause',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['Apache-2.0', 'BSD-3-Clause'],
constraint: 'Apache-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause',
expected: true
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0'],
constraint: 'MIT AND Apache-2.0',
expected: true
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR Apache-2.0',
allowList: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0'],
expected: true
constraint: 'MIT AND Apache-2.0',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'ISC OR (MIT AND Apache-2.0)',
allowList: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0'],
constraint: 'MIT AND Apache-2.0',
expected: true
},
@@ -213,39 +193,29 @@ describe('satisfies', () => {
// or unknown licenses will return 'false'
{
candidate: 'MIT',
allowList: ['MiT'],
constraint: 'MiT',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND (ISC OR',
allowList: ['MIT'],
constraint: 'MIT',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR ISC OR Apache-2.0',
allowList: [],
constraint: '',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: '',
allowList: ['BSD-3-Clause', 'ISC', 'MIT'],
constraint: '(BSD-3-Clause AND ISC) OR MIT',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT OR OTHER',
allowList: ['MIT', 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'],
expected: true
},
{
candidate: '(Apache-2.0 AND OTHER) OR (MIT AND OTHER)',
allowList: ['Apache-2.0', 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'],
expected: true
}
]
for (const unit of units) {
const got: boolean = spdx.satisfies(unit.candidate, unit.allowList)
test(`should return ${unit.expected} for ("${unit.candidate}", "${unit.allowList}")`, () => {
const got: boolean = spdx.satisfies(unit.candidate, unit.constraint)
test(`should return ${unit.expected} for ("${unit.candidate}", "${unit.constraint}")`, () => {
expect(got).toBe(unit.expected)
})
}
@@ -276,10 +246,6 @@ describe('isValid', () => {
{
candidate: '',
expected: false
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND OTHER',
expected: true
}
]
for (const unit of units) {
@@ -289,38 +255,3 @@ describe('isValid', () => {
})
}
})
describe('cleanInvalidSPDX', () => {
const units = [
{
candidate: 'MIT',
expected: 'MIT'
},
{
candidate: 'OTHER',
expected: 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'
},
{
candidate: 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER',
expected: 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'
},
{
candidate: 'OTHER AND MIT',
expected: 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER AND MIT'
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND OTHER',
expected: 'MIT AND LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER'
},
{
candidate: 'MIT AND SomethingElse-OTHER',
expected: 'MIT AND SomethingElse-OTHER'
}
]
for (const unit of units) {
const got: string = spdx.cleanInvalidSPDX(unit.candidate)
test(`should return ${unit.expected} for ("${unit.candidate}")`, () => {
expect(got).toBe(unit.expected)
})
}
})
+37 -49
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
import {expect, jest, test} from '@jest/globals'
import {Changes, ConfigurationOptions, Scorecard} from '../src/schemas'
import {Change, Changes, ConfigurationOptions, Scorecard} from '../src/schemas'
import * as summary from '../src/summary'
import * as core from '@actions/core'
import {createTestChange} from './fixtures/create-test-change'
@@ -109,38 +109,46 @@ test('prints headline as h1', () => {
expect(text).toContain('<h1>Dependency Review</h1>')
})
test('does not add deprecation warning for deny-licenses option if not set', () => {
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
test('returns minimal summary in case the core.summary is too large for a PR comment', () => {
let changes: Changes = [
createTestChange({name: 'lodash', version: '1.2.3'}),
createTestChange({name: 'colors', version: '2.3.4'}),
createTestChange({name: '@foo/bar', version: '*'})
]
let minSummary: string = summary.addSummaryToSummary(
changes,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
scorecard,
defaultConfig
)
// side effect DR report into core.summary as happens in main.ts
summary.addScannedDependencies(changes)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).not.toContain('deny-licenses')
})
expect(text).toContain('<h1>Dependency Review</h1>')
expect(minSummary).toContain('# Dependency Review')
test('adds deprecation warning for deny-licenses option if set', () => {
const config = {...defaultConfig, deny_licenses: ['MIT']}
expect(text).toContain('❌ 3 vulnerable package(s)')
expect(text).not.toContain('* ❌ 3 vulnerable package(s)')
expect(text).toContain('lodash')
expect(text).toContain('colors')
expect(text).toContain('@foo/bar')
summary.addSummaryToSummary(
emptyChanges,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
scorecard,
config
)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(minSummary).toContain('* ❌ 3 vulnerable package(s)')
expect(minSummary).not.toContain('lodash')
expect(minSummary).not.toContain('colors')
expect(minSummary).not.toContain('@foo/bar')
expect(text).toContain('deny-licenses')
expect(text.length).toBeGreaterThan(minSummary.length)
})
test('returns minimal summary formatted for posting as a PR comment', () => {
const OLD_ENV = process.env
const changes: Changes = [
let changes: Changes = [
createTestChange({name: 'lodash', version: '1.2.3'}),
createTestChange({name: 'colors', version: '2.3.4'}),
createTestChange({name: '@foo/bar', version: '*'})
@@ -150,7 +158,7 @@ test('returns minimal summary formatted for posting as a PR comment', () => {
process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY = 'owner/repo'
process.env.GITHUB_RUN_ID = 'abc-123-xyz'
const minSummary: string = summary.addSummaryToSummary(
let minSummary: string = summary.addSummaryToSummary(
changes,
emptyInvalidLicenseChanges,
emptyChanges,
@@ -224,10 +232,14 @@ test('groups dependencies with empty manifest paths together', () => {
emptyScorecard,
defaultConfig
)
summary.addScannedFiles(changesWithEmptyManifests)
summary.addScannedDependencies(changesWithEmptyManifests)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain('Unnamed Manifest')
expect(text).toContain('python/dist-info/METADATA')
expect(text).toContain('<summary>Unnamed Manifest</summary>')
expect(text).toContain('castore')
expect(text).toContain('connection')
expect(text).toContain('<summary>python/dist-info/METADATA</summary>')
expect(text).toContain('pygments')
})
test('does not include status section if nothing was found', () => {
@@ -464,9 +476,7 @@ test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes list of configured allowed licenses', ()
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, config)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'<details><summary><strong>Allowed Licenses</strong>:</summary> MIT, Apache-2.0</details>'
)
expect(text).toContain('<strong>Allowed Licenses</strong>: MIT, Apache-2.0')
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes configured denied license', () => {
@@ -478,33 +488,11 @@ test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes configured denied license', () => {
const config: ConfigurationOptions = {
...defaultConfig,
deny_licenses: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
deny_licenses: ['MIT']
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, config)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'<details><summary><strong>Denied Licenses</strong>:</summary> MIT, Apache-2.0</details>'
)
})
test('addLicensesToSummary() - includes allowed dependency licences', () => {
const licenseIssues = {
forbidden: [createTestChange()],
unresolved: [],
unlicensed: []
}
const config: ConfigurationOptions = {
...defaultConfig,
allow_dependencies_licenses: ['MIT', 'Apache-2.0']
}
summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseIssues, config)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
expect(text).toContain(
'<details><summary><strong>Excluded from license check</strong>:</summary> MIT, Apache-2.0</details>'
)
expect(text).toContain('<strong>Denied Licenses</strong>: MIT')
})
Generated Vendored
+3512 -103383
View File
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
Generated Vendored
+1 -1
View File
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
Generated Vendored
+25 -2953
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
Generated Vendored
+1 -1
View File
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
+3 -3
View File
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Examples of how to use the Dependency Review Action
# Examples on how to use the Dependency Review Action
## Basic Usage
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ The following example will use a configuration file from an external public GitH
Let's say that the configuration file is located in `github/octorepo/dependency-review-config.yml@main`
The Dependency Review Action workflow file will then look like this:
The Dependancy Review Action workflow file will then look like this:
```yaml
name: 'Dependency Review'
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ The following example will use a configuration file from an external private Gti
Let's say that the configuration file is located in `github/octorepo-private/dependency-review-config.yml@main`
The Dependency Review Action workflow file will then look like this:
The Dependancy Review Action workflow file will then look like this:
```yaml
name: 'Dependency Review'
+952 -1840
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
+18 -23
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
{
"name": "dependency-review-action",
"version": "4.8.1",
"version": "4.3.4",
"private": true,
"description": "A GitHub Action for Dependency Review",
"main": "lib/main.js",
@@ -25,42 +25,37 @@
"author": "GitHub",
"license": "MIT",
"dependencies": {
"@actions/artifact": "^2.3.2",
"@actions/core": "^1.11.1",
"@actions/github": "^6.0.1",
"@octokit/plugin-retry": "^6.1.0",
"@octokit/request-error": "^5.1.1",
"@octokit/types": "12.5.0",
"@actions/core": "^1.10.1",
"@actions/github": "^6.0.0",
"@octokit/plugin-retry": "^6.0.1",
"@octokit/request-error": "^5.0.1",
"@onebeyond/spdx-license-satisfies": "^1.0.1",
"ansi-styles": "^6.2.1",
"got": "^14.4.7",
"got": "^14.4.1",
"jest": "^29.7.0",
"octokit": "^3.1.2",
"spdx-expression-parse": "^3.0.1",
"spdx-satisfies": "^6.0.0",
"ts-jest": "^29.4.1",
"yaml": "^2.8.1",
"zod": "^3.24.1"
"spdx-satisfies": "^5.0.1",
"ts-jest": "^29.1.2",
"yaml": "^2.3.4",
"zod": "^3.23.8"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@types/jest": "^29.5.12",
"@types/node": "^20",
"@types/spdx-expression-parse": "^3.0.4",
"@types/spdx-satisfies": "^0.1.1",
"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^6.21.0",
"@typescript-eslint/parser": "^6.21.0",
"@vercel/ncc": "^0.38.3",
"esbuild-register": "^3.6.0",
"@vercel/ncc": "^0.38.0",
"esbuild-register": "^3.5.0",
"eslint": "^8.57.0",
"eslint-plugin-github": "^4.10.2",
"eslint-plugin-jest": "^28.8.3",
"eslint-plugin-prettier": "^5.5.4",
"eslint-plugin-jest": "^27.9.0",
"eslint-plugin-prettier": "^5.1.3",
"js-yaml": "^4.1.0",
"nodemon": "^3.1.10",
"prettier": "3.6.2",
"typescript": "^5.9.2"
},
"overrides": {
"cross-spawn": ">=7.0.5",
"@octokit/[email protected]": "5.1.1"
"nodemon": "^3.1.0",
"prettier": "3.2.5",
"typescript": "^5.4.5"
}
}
+1 -1
View File
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ async function createSummary(
...licenseIssues.unlicensed
]
summary.addScannedFiles(allChanges)
summary.addScannedDependencies(allChanges)
const text = core.summary.stringify()
await fs.promises.writeFile(path.resolve(tmpDir, fileName), text, {
+84 -5
View File
@@ -1,8 +1,87 @@
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
require 'json'
require 'tempfile'
require 'open3'
require 'bundler/inline'
require 'optparse'
# Load the scan_pr library
require_relative 'scan_pr_lib'
gemfile do
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'octokit'
end
# Create and run the scanner
scanner = ScanPr.new
scanner.run(ARGV)
config_file = nil
github_token = ENV["GITHUB_TOKEN"]
if !github_token || github_token.empty?
puts "Please set the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable"
exit -1
end
op = OptionParser.new do |opts|
usage = <<EOF
Run Dependency Review on a repository.
\e[1mUsage:\e[22m
scripts/scan_pr [options] <pr_url>
\e[1mExample:\e[22m
scripts/scan_pr https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/pull/294
EOF
opts.banner = usage
opts.on('-c', '--config-file <FILE>', 'Use an external configuration file') do |cf|
config_file = cf
end
opts.on("-h", "--help", "Prints this help") do
puts opts
exit
end
end
op.parse!
# make sure we have a NWO somewhere in the parameters
arg = /(?<repo_nwo>[\w\-]+\/[\w\-]+)\/pull\/(?<pr_number>\d+)/.match(ARGV.join(" "))
if arg.nil?
puts op
exit -1
end
repo_nwo = arg[:repo_nwo]
pr_number = arg[:pr_number]
octo = Octokit::Client.new(access_token: github_token)
pr = octo.pull_request(repo_nwo, pr_number)
event_file = Tempfile.new
event_file.write("{ \"pull_request\": #{pr.to_h.to_json}}")
event_file.close
action_inputs = {
"repo-token": github_token,
"config-file": config_file
}
dev_cmd_env = {
"GITHUB_REPOSITORY" => repo_nwo,
"GITHUB_EVENT_NAME" => "pull_request",
"GITHUB_EVENT_PATH" => event_file.path,
"GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY" => "/dev/null"
}
# bash does not like variable names with dashes like the ones Actions
# uses (e.g. INPUT_REPO-TOKEN). Passing them through `env` instead of
# manually setting them does the job.
action_inputs_env_str = action_inputs.map { |name, value| "\"INPUT_#{name.upcase}=#{value}\"" }.join(" ")
dev_cmd = "./node_modules/.bin/nodemon --exec \"env #{action_inputs_env_str} node -r esbuild-register\" src/main.ts"
Open3.popen2e(dev_cmd_env, dev_cmd) do |stdin, out|
while line = out.gets
puts line.gsub(github_token, "<REDACTED>")
end
end
-128
View File
@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
require 'json'
require 'tempfile'
require 'open3'
require 'bundler/inline'
require 'optparse'
gemfile do
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'octokit'
end
class ScanPr
def initialize
@config_file = nil
@github_token = ENV["GITHUB_TOKEN"]
validate_token
end
def run(args)
parse_options(args)
repo_nwo, pr_number = extract_repo_and_pr(args)
pr = fetch_pull_request(repo_nwo, pr_number)
event_file = create_event_file(pr)
execute_dependency_review(repo_nwo, event_file)
ensure
event_file&.unlink
end
private
def validate_token
if !@github_token || @github_token.empty?
puts "Please set the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable"
exit -1
end
end
def parse_options(args)
op = OptionParser.new do |opts|
usage = <<EOF
Run Dependency Review on a repository.
\e[1mUsage:\e[22m
scripts/scan_pr [options] <pr_url>
\e[1mExample:\e[22m
scripts/scan_pr https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/pull/294
EOF
opts.banner = usage
opts.on('-c', '--config-file <FILE>', 'Use an external configuration file') do |cf|
@config_file = cf
end
opts.on("-h", "--help", "Prints this help") do
puts opts
exit
end
end
op.parse!(args)
@option_parser = op
end
def extract_repo_and_pr(args)
# make sure we have a NWO somewhere in the parameters
arg = /(?<repo_nwo>[\w\-]+\/[\w\-]+)\/pull\/(?<pr_number>\d+)/.match(args.join(" "))
if arg.nil?
puts @option_parser
exit -1
end
[arg[:repo_nwo], arg[:pr_number]]
end
def fetch_pull_request(repo_nwo, pr_number)
octo = Octokit::Client.new(access_token: @github_token)
octo.pull_request(repo_nwo, pr_number)
end
def create_event_file(pr)
event_file = Tempfile.new
event_file.write("{ \"pull_request\": #{pr.to_h.to_json}}")
event_file.close
event_file
end
def execute_dependency_review(repo_nwo, event_file)
action_inputs = {
"repo-token": @github_token,
"config-file": @config_file
}
dev_cmd_env = {
"GITHUB_REPOSITORY" => repo_nwo,
"GITHUB_EVENT_NAME" => "pull_request",
"GITHUB_EVENT_PATH" => event_file.path,
"GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY" => "/dev/null"
}
# Merge action inputs into environment, formatting keys as INPUT_...
action_inputs_env = action_inputs.each_with_object({}) do |(name, value), h|
h["INPUT_#{name.to_s.upcase}"] = value unless value.nil?
end
env = dev_cmd_env.merge(action_inputs_env)
dev_cmd = [
"./node_modules/.bin/nodemon",
"--exec",
"node",
"-r",
"esbuild-register",
"src/main.ts"
]
Open3.popen2e(env, *dev_cmd) do |stdin, out|
while line = out.gets
puts line.gsub(@github_token, "<REDACTED>")
end
end
end
end
+3 -3
View File
@@ -17,13 +17,13 @@ const COMMENT_MARKER = '<!-- dependency-review-pr-comment-marker -->'
export async function commentPr(
commentContent: string,
config: ConfigurationOptions,
issueFound: boolean
config: ConfigurationOptions
): Promise<void> {
if (
!(
config.comment_summary_in_pr === 'always' ||
(config.comment_summary_in_pr === 'on-failure' && issueFound)
(config.comment_summary_in_pr === 'on-failure' &&
process.exitCode === core.ExitCode.Failure)
)
) {
return
+9 -4
View File
@@ -9,17 +9,15 @@ export async function getDeniedChanges(
): Promise<Change[]> {
const changesDenied: Change[] = []
let hasDeniedPackage = false
for (const change of changes) {
if (change.change_type === 'removed') {
continue
}
for (const denied of deniedPackages) {
if (
(!denied.version || change.version === denied.version) &&
change.name === denied.name
) {
changesDenied.push(change)
hasDeniedPackage = true
}
}
@@ -32,10 +30,17 @@ export async function getDeniedChanges(
}
if (namespace && namespace === denied.namespace) {
changesDenied.push(change)
hasDeniedPackage = true
}
}
}
if (hasDeniedPackage) {
core.setFailed('Dependency review detected denied packages.')
} else {
core.info('Dependency review did not detect any denied packages')
}
return changesDenied
}
+10 -22
View File
@@ -1,34 +1,22 @@
import {
PullRequestSchema,
ConfigurationOptions,
MergeGroupSchema
} from './schemas'
import {PullRequestSchema, ConfigurationOptions} from './schemas'
export function getRefs(
config: ConfigurationOptions,
context: {
payload: {pull_request?: unknown; merge_group?: unknown}
eventName: string
}
context: {payload: {pull_request?: unknown}; eventName: string}
): {base: string; head: string} {
let base_ref = config.base_ref
let head_ref = config.head_ref
// If possible, source default base & head refs from the GitHub event.
// The base/head ref from the config take priority, if provided.
if (!base_ref && !head_ref) {
if (
context.eventName === 'pull_request' ||
context.eventName === 'pull_request_target'
) {
const pull_request = PullRequestSchema.parse(context.payload.pull_request)
base_ref = base_ref || pull_request.base.sha
head_ref = head_ref || pull_request.head.sha
} else if (context.eventName === 'merge_group') {
const merge_group = MergeGroupSchema.parse(context.payload.merge_group)
base_ref = base_ref || merge_group.base_sha
head_ref = head_ref || merge_group.head_sha
}
if (
context.eventName === 'pull_request' ||
context.eventName === 'pull_request_target' ||
context.eventName === 'merge_group'
) {
const pull_request = PullRequestSchema.parse(context.payload.pull_request)
base_ref = base_ref || pull_request.base.sha
head_ref = head_ref || pull_request.head.sha
}
if (!base_ref && !head_ref) {
+32 -47
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
import {Change, Changes} from './schemas'
import {octokitClient} from './utils'
import {parsePURL, PackageURL} from './purl'
import {parsePURL} from './purl'
import * as spdx from './spdx'
/**
@@ -29,24 +29,41 @@ export async function getInvalidLicenseChanges(
licenseExclusions?: string[]
}
): Promise<InvalidLicenseChanges> {
const deny = licenses.deny
let allow = licenses.allow
// Filter out elements of the allow list that include AND
// or OR because the list should be simple license IDs and
// not expressions.
allow = allow?.filter(license => {
return !license.includes(' AND ') && !license.includes(' OR ')
})
const {allow, deny} = licenses
const licenseExclusions = licenses.licenseExclusions?.map(
(pkgUrl: string) => {
return parsePURL(pkgUrl)
}
)
const groupedChanges = await groupChanges(changes, licenseExclusions)
const groupedChanges = await groupChanges(changes)
// Takes the changes from the groupedChanges object and filters out the ones that are part of the exclusions list
// It does by creating a new PackageURL object from the change and comparing it to the exclusions list
groupedChanges.licensed = groupedChanges.licensed.filter(change => {
if (change.package_url.length === 0) {
return true
}
const changeAsPackageURL = parsePURL(encodeURI(change.package_url))
// We want to find if the licenseExclusion list contains the PackageURL of the Change
// If it does, we want to filter it out and therefore return false
// If it doesn't, we want to keep it and therefore return true
if (
licenseExclusions !== null &&
licenseExclusions !== undefined &&
licenseExclusions.findIndex(
exclusion =>
exclusion.type === changeAsPackageURL.type &&
exclusion.name === changeAsPackageURL.name
) !== -1
) {
return false
} else {
return true
}
})
const licensedChanges: Changes = groupedChanges.licensed
const invalidLicenseChanges: InvalidLicenseChanges = {
@@ -71,7 +88,7 @@ export async function getInvalidLicenseChanges(
try {
if (allow !== undefined) {
if (spdx.isValid(license)) {
const found = spdx.satisfies(license, allow)
const found = spdx.satisfiesAny(license, allow)
validityCache.set(license, found)
} else {
invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved.push(change)
@@ -155,48 +172,16 @@ const truncatedDGLicense = (license: string): boolean =>
license.length === 255 && !spdx.isValid(license)
async function groupChanges(
changes: Changes,
licenseExclusions: PackageURL[] | null = null
changes: Changes
): Promise<Record<string, Changes>> {
const result: Record<string, Changes> = {
licensed: [],
unlicensed: []
}
let candidateChanges = changes
// If a package is excluded from license checking, we don't bother trying to
// fetch the license for it and we leave it off of the `licensed` and
// `unlicensed` lists.
if (licenseExclusions !== null && licenseExclusions !== undefined) {
candidateChanges = candidateChanges.filter(change => {
if (change.package_url.length === 0) {
return true
}
const changeAsPackageURL = parsePURL(encodeURI(change.package_url))
// We want to find if the licenseExclusion list contains the PackageURL of the Change
// If it does, we want to filter it out and therefore return false
// If it doesn't, we want to keep it and therefore return true
if (
licenseExclusions.findIndex(
exclusion =>
exclusion.type === changeAsPackageURL.type &&
exclusion.namespace === changeAsPackageURL.namespace &&
exclusion.name === changeAsPackageURL.name
) !== -1
) {
return false
} else {
return true
}
})
}
const ghChanges = []
for (const change of candidateChanges) {
for (const change of changes) {
if (change.change_type === 'removed') {
continue
}
+24 -87
View File
@@ -24,8 +24,7 @@ import {getRefs} from './git-refs'
import {groupDependenciesByManifest} from './utils'
import {commentPr, MAX_COMMENT_LENGTH} from './comment-pr'
import {getDeniedChanges} from './deny'
import * as artifact from '@actions/artifact'
import * as fs from 'fs'
import {MAX_SUMMARY_LENGTH} from './summary'
async function delay(ms: number): Promise<void> {
return new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, ms))
@@ -63,41 +62,6 @@ async function getComparison(
return comparison
}
export async function handleLargeSummary(
summaryContent: string
): Promise<string> {
const MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE = 1024 * 1024 // 1024k in bytes
if (Buffer.byteLength(summaryContent, 'utf8') <= MAX_SUMMARY_SIZE) {
return summaryContent
}
const artifactClient = new artifact.DefaultArtifactClient()
const artifactName = 'dependency-review-summary'
const files = ['summary.md']
try {
// Write the summary to a file
await fs.promises.writeFile('summary.md', summaryContent)
// Upload the artifact
await artifactClient.uploadArtifact(artifactName, files, '.', {
retentionDays: 1
})
// Return a minimal summary with a link to the artifact
return `# Dependency Review Summary
The full dependency review summary is too large to display here. Please download the artifact named "${artifactName}" to view the complete report.
[View full job summary](${process.env.GITHUB_SERVER_URL}/${process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY}/actions/runs/${process.env.GITHUB_RUN_ID})`
} catch (error) {
core.warning(
`Failed to handle large summary: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'}`
)
return summaryContent
}
}
async function run(): Promise<void> {
try {
const config = await readConfig()
@@ -178,16 +142,10 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
summary.addSnapshotWarnings(config, snapshot_warnings)
}
let issueFound = false
if (config.vulnerability_check) {
core.setOutput('vulnerable-changes', JSON.stringify(vulnerableChanges))
summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(vulnerableChanges, minSeverity)
issueFound ||= await printVulnerabilitiesBlock(
vulnerableChanges,
minSeverity,
warnOnly
)
printVulnerabilitiesBlock(vulnerableChanges, minSeverity, warnOnly)
}
if (config.license_check) {
core.setOutput(
@@ -195,12 +153,12 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
JSON.stringify(invalidLicenseChanges)
)
summary.addLicensesToSummary(invalidLicenseChanges, config)
issueFound ||= await printLicensesBlock(invalidLicenseChanges, warnOnly)
printLicensesBlock(invalidLicenseChanges, warnOnly)
}
if (config.deny_packages || config.deny_groups) {
core.setOutput('denied-changes', JSON.stringify(deniedChanges))
summary.addDeniedToSummary(deniedChanges)
issueFound ||= await printDeniedDependencies(deniedChanges, config)
printDeniedDependencies(deniedChanges, config)
}
if (config.show_openssf_scorecard) {
summary.addScorecardToSummary(scorecard, config)
@@ -209,16 +167,13 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
}
core.setOutput('dependency-changes', JSON.stringify(changes))
summary.addScannedFiles(changes)
summary.addScannedDependencies(changes)
printScannedDependencies(changes)
// include full summary in output; Actions will truncate if oversized
let rendered = core.summary.stringify()
core.setOutput('comment-content', rendered)
// Handle large summaries by uploading as artifact
rendered = await handleLargeSummary(rendered)
// if the summary is oversized, replace with minimal version
if (rendered.length >= MAX_COMMENT_LENGTH) {
core.debug(
@@ -228,7 +183,7 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
}
// update the PR comment if needed with the right-sized summary
await commentPr(rendered, config, issueFound)
await commentPr(rendered, config)
} catch (error) {
if (error instanceof RequestError && error.status === 404) {
core.setFailed(
@@ -236,7 +191,7 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
)
} else if (error instanceof RequestError && error.status === 403) {
core.setFailed(
`Dependency review is not supported on this repository. Please ensure that Dependency graph is enabled along with GitHub Advanced Security on private repositories, see ${github.context.serverUrl}/${github.context.repo.owner}/${github.context.repo.repo}/settings/security_analysis`
`Dependency review is not supported on this repository. Please ensure that Dependency graph is enabled along with GitHub Advanced Security on private repositories, see https://github.com/${github.context.repo.owner}/${github.context.repo.repo}/settings/security_analysis`
)
} else {
if (error instanceof Error) {
@@ -246,20 +201,22 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
}
}
} finally {
await core.summary.write()
await core.summary.write() // need to write the minSummary content to this
}
}
async function printVulnerabilitiesBlock(
function printVulnerabilitiesBlock(
addedChanges: Changes,
minSeverity: Severity,
warnOnly: boolean
): Promise<boolean> {
return core.group('Vulnerabilities', async () => {
let vulFound = false
for (const change of addedChanges) {
vulFound ||= printChangeVulnerabilities(change)
): void {
let vulFound = false
core.group('Vulnerabilities', async () => {
if (addedChanges.length > 0) {
for (const change of addedChanges) {
printChangeVulnerabilities(change)
}
vulFound = true
}
if (vulFound) {
@@ -274,12 +231,10 @@ async function printVulnerabilitiesBlock(
`Dependency review did not detect any vulnerable packages with severity level "${minSeverity}" or higher.`
)
}
return vulFound
})
}
function printChangeVulnerabilities(change: Change): boolean {
function printChangeVulnerabilities(change: Change): void {
for (const vuln of change.vulnerabilities) {
core.info(
`${styles.bold.open}${change.manifest} » ${change.name}@${
@@ -290,18 +245,14 @@ function printChangeVulnerabilities(change: Change): boolean {
)
core.info(`${vuln.advisory_url}`)
}
return change.vulnerabilities.length > 0
}
async function printLicensesBlock(
function printLicensesBlock(
invalidLicenseChanges: Record<string, Changes>,
warnOnly: boolean
): Promise<boolean> {
return core.group('Licenses', async () => {
let issueFound = false
): void {
core.group('Licenses', async () => {
if (invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden.length > 0) {
issueFound = true
core.info('\nThe following dependencies have incompatible licenses:')
printLicensesError(invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden)
const msg = 'Dependency review detected incompatible licenses.'
@@ -312,7 +263,6 @@ async function printLicensesBlock(
}
}
if (invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved.length > 0) {
issueFound = true
core.warning(
'\nThe validity of the licenses of the dependencies below could not be determined. Ensure that they are valid SPDX licenses:'
)
@@ -322,8 +272,6 @@ async function printLicensesBlock(
)
}
printNullLicenses(invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed)
return issueFound
})
}
@@ -423,13 +371,11 @@ function printScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {
})
}
async function printDeniedDependencies(
function printDeniedDependencies(
changes: Changes,
config: ConfigurationOptions
): Promise<boolean> {
return core.group('Denied', async () => {
let issueFound = false
): void {
core.group('Denied', async () => {
for (const denied of config.deny_packages) {
core.info(`Config: ${denied}`)
}
@@ -438,15 +384,6 @@ async function printDeniedDependencies(
core.info(`Change: ${change.name}@${change.version} is denied`)
core.info(`Change: ${change.package_url} is denied`)
}
if (changes.length > 0) {
issueFound = true
core.setFailed('Dependency review detected denied packages.')
} else {
core.info('Dependency review did not detect any denied packages')
}
return issueFound
})
}
-5
View File
@@ -91,11 +91,6 @@ export const PullRequestSchema = z.object({
head: z.object({sha: z.string()})
})
export const MergeGroupSchema = z.object({
base_sha: z.string(),
head_sha: z.string()
})
export const ConfigurationOptionsSchema = z
.object({
fail_on_severity: SeveritySchema,
-4
View File
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
declare module 'spdx-satisfies' {
function spdxSatisfies(candidate: string, allowList: string[]): boolean
export = spdxSatisfies
}
+5 -15
View File
@@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
import * as spdxlib from '@onebeyond/spdx-license-satisfies'
import spdxSatisfies from 'spdx-satisfies'
import parse from 'spdx-expression-parse'
/*
@@ -11,10 +10,12 @@ import parse from 'spdx-expression-parse'
// accepts a pair of well-formed SPDX expressions. the
// candidate is tested against the constraint
export function satisfies(candidateExpr: string, allowList: string[]): boolean {
candidateExpr = cleanInvalidSPDX(candidateExpr)
export function satisfies(
candidateExpr: string,
constraintExpr: string
): boolean {
try {
return spdxSatisfies(candidateExpr, allowList)
return spdxlib.satisfies(candidateExpr, constraintExpr)
} catch (_) {
return false
}
@@ -25,7 +26,6 @@ export function satisfiesAny(
candidateExpr: string,
licenses: string[]
): boolean {
candidateExpr = cleanInvalidSPDX(candidateExpr)
try {
return spdxlib.satisfiesAny(candidateExpr, licenses)
} catch (_) {
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ export function satisfiesAll(
candidateExpr: string,
licenses: string[]
): boolean {
candidateExpr = cleanInvalidSPDX(candidateExpr)
try {
return spdxlib.satisfiesAll(candidateExpr, licenses)
} catch (_) {
@@ -48,7 +47,6 @@ export function satisfiesAll(
// accepts any SPDX expression
export function isValid(spdxExpr: string): boolean {
spdxExpr = cleanInvalidSPDX(spdxExpr)
try {
parse(spdxExpr)
return true
@@ -56,11 +54,3 @@ export function isValid(spdxExpr: string): boolean {
return false
}
}
const replaceOtherRegex = /(?<![\w-])OTHER(?![\w-])/g
// adjusts license expressions to not include the invalid `OTHER`
// which ClearlyDefined adds to license strings
export function cleanInvalidSPDX(spdxExpr: string): string {
return spdxExpr.replace(replaceOtherRegex, 'LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER')
}
+18 -47
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
import * as core from '@actions/core'
import {ConfigurationOptions, Changes, Change, Scorecard} from './schemas'
import {SummaryTableRow} from '@actions/core/lib/summary'
import {InvalidLicenseChanges, InvalidLicenseChangeTypes} from './licenses'
import {Change, Changes, ConfigurationOptions, Scorecard} from './schemas'
import {groupDependenciesByManifest, getManifestsSet, renderUrl} from './utils'
const icons = {
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ const icons = {
warning: '⚠️'
}
const MAX_SCANNED_FILES_BYTES = 1048576
export const MAX_SUMMARY_LENGTH = 1048576
// generates the DR report summmary and caches it to the Action's core.summary.
// returns the DR summary string, ready to be posted as a PR comment if the
@@ -22,10 +22,6 @@ export function addSummaryToSummary(
scorecard: Scorecard,
config: ConfigurationOptions
): string {
if (config.deny_licenses && config.deny_licenses.length > 0) {
addDenyListsDeprecationWarningToSummary()
}
const out: string[] = []
const scorecardWarnings = countScorecardWarnings(scorecard, config)
@@ -110,13 +106,6 @@ export function addSummaryToSummary(
return out.join('\n')
}
function addDenyListsDeprecationWarningToSummary(): void {
core.summary.addRaw(
`${icons.warning} <strong>Deprecation Warning</strong>: The <em>deny-licenses</em> option is deprecated for possible removal in the next major release. For more information, see issue 997.`,
true
)
}
function countScorecardWarnings(
scorecard: Scorecard,
config: ConfigurationOptions
@@ -206,17 +195,19 @@ export function addLicensesToSummary(
if (config.allow_licenses && config.allow_licenses.length > 0) {
core.summary.addQuote(
`<details><summary><strong>Allowed Licenses</strong>:</summary> ${config.allow_licenses.join(', ')}</details>`
`<strong>Allowed Licenses</strong>: ${config.allow_licenses.join(', ')}`
)
}
if (config.deny_licenses && config.deny_licenses.length > 0) {
core.summary.addQuote(
`<details><summary><strong>Denied Licenses</strong>:</summary> ${config.deny_licenses.join(', ')}</details>`
`<strong>Denied Licenses</strong>: ${config.deny_licenses.join(', ')}`
)
}
if (config.allow_dependencies_licenses) {
core.summary.addQuote(
`<details><summary><strong>Excluded from license check</strong>:</summary> ${config.allow_dependencies_licenses.join(', ')}</details>`
`<strong>Excluded from license check</strong>: ${config.allow_dependencies_licenses.join(
', '
)}`
)
}
@@ -274,37 +265,20 @@ function formatLicense(license: string | null): string {
return license
}
export function addScannedFiles(changes: Changes): void {
const manifests = Array.from(
groupDependenciesByManifest(changes).keys()
).sort()
export function addScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {
const dependencies = groupDependenciesByManifest(changes)
const manifests = dependencies.keys()
let sf_size = 0
let trunc_at = -1
const summary = core.summary.addHeading('Scanned Manifest Files', 2)
for (const [index, entry] of manifests.entries()) {
if (sf_size + entry.length >= MAX_SCANNED_FILES_BYTES) {
trunc_at = index
break
for (const manifest of manifests) {
const deps = dependencies.get(manifest)
if (deps) {
const dependencyNames = deps.map(
dependency => `<li>${dependency.name}@${dependency.version}</li>`
)
summary.addDetails(manifest, `<ul>${dependencyNames.join('')}</ul>`)
}
sf_size += entry.length
}
if (trunc_at >= 0) {
// truncate the manifests list if it will overflow the summary output
manifests.slice(0, trunc_at)
// if there's room between cutoff size and list size, add a warning
const size_diff = MAX_SCANNED_FILES_BYTES - sf_size
if (size_diff < 12) {
manifests.push('(truncated)')
}
}
const summary = core.summary.addHeading('Scanned Files', 2)
if (manifests.length === 0) {
summary.addRaw('None')
} else {
summary.addList(manifests)
}
}
@@ -330,9 +304,6 @@ export function addScorecardToSummary(
scorecard: Scorecard,
config: ConfigurationOptions
): void {
if (scorecard.dependencies.length === 0) {
return
}
core.summary.addHeading('OpenSSF Scorecard', 2)
if (scorecard.dependencies.length > 10) {
core.summary.addRaw(`<details><summary>Scorecard details</summary>`, true)