From 674fdb4fcbf6f896de92ef2ddca5a3eaa29b2b93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sukibaby <163092272+sukibaby@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:59:38 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Correct an invalid jpeg quality parameter.

With our new libjpeg_turbo library, a quality of 150 doesn't seem to be valid, so I'm changing this to 95. I chose 95 over 100 because the libjpeg_turbo project uses a quality of 95 for all testing and benchmarking shown in their documentation, and notes that a quality of 95 "has been determined to be perceptually lossless under most viewing conditions".
---
 src/RageSurface_Save_JPEG.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/RageSurface_Save_JPEG.cpp b/src/RageSurface_Save_JPEG.cpp
index 6222ecb2cd..e81f23b1e5 100644
--- a/src/RageSurface_Save_JPEG.cpp
+++ b/src/RageSurface_Save_JPEG.cpp
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ bool RageSurfaceUtils::SaveJPEG( RageSurface *surface, RageFile &f, bool bHighQu
 	jpeg::jpeg_set_defaults(&cinfo);
 
 	if( bHighQual )
-		jpeg::jpeg_set_quality( &cinfo, 150, TRUE );
+		jpeg::jpeg_set_quality( &cinfo, 95, TRUE );
 	else
 		jpeg::jpeg_set_quality( &cinfo, 70, TRUE );