Fixing typo in config.test.ts.

Include the license-check and vulnerability-check options in the config
documentation in the README.

Also fix a typo in the README ("configuraton" -> "configuration").

.devcontainer/devcontainer.json

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+{
+  "name": "Dependency Review Action",
+  "image": "mcr.microsoft.com/devcontainers/typescript-node:18",
+  "postCreateCommand": "npm install",
+  "remoteUser": "node",
+  "features": {
+    "ghcr.io/devcontainers/features/ruby:1": {}
+  }
+}

.github/dependency-review-config.yml

@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-fail-on-severity: low

.github/workflows/check-dist.yml

@@ -23,10 +23,10 @@ jobs:
     steps:
       - uses: actions/checkout@v3
 
-      - name: Set Node.js 16.x
+      - name: Set Node.js 18.x
         uses: actions/setup-node@v3
         with:
-          node-version: 16.x
+          node-version: 18.x
 
       - name: Install dependencies
         run: npm ci

.github/workflows/ci.yml

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ jobs:
       - uses: actions/checkout@v3
       - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
         with:
-          node-version: 16
+          node-version: 18
           cache: npm
       - name: Install dependencies
         run: npm ci --ignore-scripts
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ jobs:
       - uses: actions/checkout@v3
       - uses: actions/setup-node@v3
         with:
-          node-version: 16
+          node-version: 18
           cache: npm
       - name: Install dependencies
         run: npm ci --ignore-scripts

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 # Contributing
+
 [fork]: https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/fork
 [pr]: https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/compare
 [code-of-conduct]: CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md
@@ -9,7 +10,6 @@ Contributions to this project are
 [released](https://help.github.com/articles/github-terms-of-service/#6-contributions-under-repository-license)
 to the public under the [project's open source license](LICENSE).
 
-
 Please note that this project is released with a [Contributor Code of
 Conduct][code-of-conduct]. By participating in this project you agree
 to abide by its terms.
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ This Action makes an authenticated query to the Dependency Graph Diff
 API endpoint (`GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependency-graph/compare/{basehead}`)
 to find out the set of added and removed dependencies for each manifest.
 
-
 ### Bootstrapping the project
 
 ```
@@ -35,10 +34,11 @@ npm install
 npm run test
 ```
 
-*Note*: We don't have any useful tests yet, contributions are welcome!
+_Note_: We don't have any useful tests yet, contributions are welcome!
 
 ## Local Development
 
+It is recommended to have atleast [Node 18](https://nodejs.org/en/) installed.
 We have a script to scan a given PR for vulnerabilities, this will
 help you test your local changes. Make sure to [grab a Personal Access Token (PAT)](https://github.com/settings/tokens) before proceeding (you'll need `repo` permissions for private repos):
 
@@ -56,16 +56,24 @@ Like this:
 $ GITHUB_TOKEN=my-secret-token ./scripts/scan_pr https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/pull/3
 ```
 
+[Configuration options](README.md#configuration-options) can be set by
+passing an external YAML [configuration file](README.md#configuration-file) to the
+`scan_pr` script with the `-c`/`--config-file` option:
+
+```sh
+$ GITHUB_TOKEN=<token> ./scripts/scan_pr --config-file my_custom_config.yml <pr_url>
+```
+
 ## Submitting a pull request
 
 0. [Fork][fork] and clone the repository
-0. Configure and install the dependencies: `npm install`
+1. Configure and install the dependencies: `npm install`
-0. Make sure the tests pass on your machine: `npm run test`
+2. Make sure the tests pass on your machine: `npm run test`
-0. Create a new branch: `git checkout -b my-branch-name`
+3. Create a new branch: `git checkout -b my-branch-name`
-0. Make your change, add tests, and make sure the tests still pass
+4. Make your change, add tests, and make sure the tests still pass
-0. Make sure to build and package before pushing: `npm run build && npm run package`
+5. Make sure to build and package before pushing: `npm run build && npm run package`
-0. Push to your fork and [submit a pull request][pr]
+6. Push to your fork and [submit a pull request][pr]
-0. Pat your self on the back and wait for your pull request to be reviewed and merged.
+7. Pat your self on the back and wait for your pull request to be reviewed and merged.
 
 Here are a few things you can do that will increase the likelihood of your pull request being accepted:
 
@@ -77,21 +85,21 @@ Here are a few things you can do that will increase the likelihood of your pull
 
 1. Update the version number in [package.json](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/blob/main/package.json).
 1. Go to [Draft a new
-release](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/releases/new)
+   release](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/releases/new)
-in the Releases page.
+   in the Releases page.
-2. Make sure that the `Publish this Action to the GitHub Marketplace`
+1. Make sure that the `Publish this Action to the GitHub Marketplace`
-checkbox is enabled
+   checkbox is enabled
 
 <img width="481" alt="Screenshot 2022-06-15 at 12 08 19" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2161/173822484-4b60d8b4-c674-4bff-b5ff-b0c4a3650ab7.png">
 
 3. Click "Choose a tag" and then "Create new tag", where the tag name
-will be your version prefixed by a `v` (e.g. `v1.2.3`).
+   will be your version prefixed by a `v` (e.g. `v1.2.3`).
 4. Use a version number for the release title (e.g. "1.2.3").
 
 <img width="700" alt="Screenshot 2022-06-15 at 12 08 36" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2161/173822548-33ab3432-d679-4dc1-adf8-b50fdaf47de3.png">
 
 5. Add your release notes. If this is a major version make sure to
-include a small description of the biggest changes in the new version.
+   include a small description of the biggest changes in the new version.
 6. Click "Publish Release".
 
 You now have a tag and release using the semver version you used
@@ -102,6 +110,7 @@ automatically getting all the
 minor/patch updates.
 
 To do this just checkout `main`, force-create a new annotated tag, and push it:
+
 ```
 git tag -fa v2 -m "Updating v2 to 2.3.4"
 git push origin v2 --force

README.md

@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ or by inlining these options in your workflow file.
 
 ### config-file
 
-A string representing the path to an external configuraton file. By
+A string representing the path to an external configuration file. By
 default external configuration files are not used.
 
 **Possible values**: A string representing the absolute path to the
@@ -106,19 +106,20 @@ fail-on-scopes:
 
 ### allow-licenses
 
-Only allow the licenses in this list. See "[Licenses](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action#licenses)".
+Only allow the licenses that comply with the expressions in this list. See "[Licenses](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action#licenses)".
 
-**Possible values**: Any `spdx_id` value(s) from
+**Possible values**: A list of of [SPDX-compliant license identifiers](https://spdx.org/licenses/).
-https://docs.github.com/en/rest/licenses.
 
-**Inline example**: `allow-licenses: BSD-3-Clause, MIT`
+**Inline example**: `allow-licenses: BSD-3-Clause, LGPL-2.1 OR MIT OR BSD-3-Clause`
 
 **YAML example**:
 
 ```yaml
 allow-licenses:
   - BSD-3-Clause
+  - LGPL-2.1
   - MIT
+  - BSD-3-Clause
 ```
 
 ### deny-licenses
@@ -126,17 +127,16 @@ allow-licenses:
 Add a custom list of licenses you want to block. See
 "[Licenses](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action#licenses)".
 
-**Possible values**: Any `spdx_id` value(s) from
+**Possible values**: Any valid set of [SPDX licenses](https://spdx.org/licenses/).
-https://docs.github.com/en/rest/licenses.
 
-**Inline example**: `deny-licenses: LGPL-2.0, BSD-2-Clause`
+**Inline example**: `deny-licenses: LGPL-2.0, GPL-2.0+ WITH Bison-exception-2.2`
 
 **YAML example**:
 
 ```yaml
 deny-licenses:
   - LGPL-2.0
-  - BSD-2-Clause
+  - GPL-2.0+ WITH Bison-exception-2.2
 ```
 
 ### allow-ghsas
@@ -155,6 +155,20 @@ allow-ghsas:
   - GHSA-efgh-1234-5679
 ```
 
+### license-check/vulnerability-check
+
+Disable the license checks or vulnerability checks performed by this Action.
+You can't disable both checks.
+
+**Possible values**: `true` or `false`
+
+**Example**:
+
+```yaml
+license-check: true
+vulnerability-check: false
+```
+
 ### base-ref/head-ref
 
 Provide custom git references for the git base/head when performing
@@ -259,8 +273,8 @@ forbid a subset of licenses. These options are not supported on Enterprise Serve
 
 You can use the [Licenses
 API](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/licenses) to see the full list of
-supported licenses. Use the `spdx_id` field for every license you want
+supported licenses. Use [SPDX licenses](https://spdx.org/licenses/)
-to filter. A couple of examples:
+to filter the licenses. A couple of examples:
 
 ```yaml
 # only allow MIT-licensed dependents
@@ -275,7 +289,7 @@ to filter. A couple of examples:
 - name: Dependency Review
   uses: actions/dependency-review-action@v2
   with:
-    deny-licenses: Apache-1.1, Apache-2.0
+    deny-licenses: Apache-1.1+
 ```
 
 ### Considerations

__tests__/config.test.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 import {expect, test, beforeEach} from '@jest/globals'
 import {readConfig, readConfigFile} from '../src/config'
 import {getRefs} from '../src/git-refs'
+import * as Utils from '../src/utils'
 
 // GitHub Action inputs come in the form of environment variables
 // with an INPUT prefix (e.g. INPUT_FAIL-ON-SEVERITY)
@@ -17,6 +18,8 @@ function clearInputs() {
     'ALLOW-LICENSES',
     'DENY-LICENSES',
     'ALLOW-GHSAS',
+    'LICENSE-CHECK',
+    'VULNERABILITY-CHECK',
     'CONFIG-FILE',
     'BASE-REF',
     'HEAD-REF'
@@ -27,6 +30,10 @@ function clearInputs() {
   })
 }
 
+beforeAll(() => {
+  jest.spyOn(Utils, 'isSPDXValid').mockReturnValue(true)
+})
+
 beforeEach(() => {
   clearInputs()
 })
@@ -175,3 +182,63 @@ test('it successfully parses GHSA allowlist', async () => {
     'GHSA-efgh-1234-5679'
   ])
 })
+
+test('it defaults to checking licenses', async () => {
+  const options = readConfig()
+  expect(options.license_check).toBe(true)
+})
+
+test('it parses the license-check input', async () => {
+  setInput('license-check', 'false')
+  let options = readConfig()
+  expect(options.license_check).toEqual(false)
+
+  clearInputs()
+  setInput('license-check', 'true')
+  options = readConfig()
+  expect(options.license_check).toEqual(true)
+})
+
+test('it defaults to checking vulnerabilities', async () => {
+  const options = readConfig()
+  expect(options.vulnerability_check).toBe(true)
+})
+
+test('it parses the vulnerability-check input', async () => {
+  setInput('vulnerability-check', 'false')
+  let options = readConfig()
+  expect(options.vulnerability_check).toEqual(false)
+
+  clearInputs()
+  setInput('vulnerability-check', 'true')
+  options = readConfig()
+  expect(options.vulnerability_check).toEqual(true)
+})
+
+test('it is not possible to disable both checks', async () => {
+  setInput('license-check', 'false')
+  setInput('vulnerability-check', 'false')
+  expect(() => {
+    readConfig()
+  }).toThrow("Can't disable both license-check and vulnerability-check")
+})
+
+describe('licenses that are not valid SPDX licenses', () => {
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    jest.spyOn(Utils, 'isSPDXValid').mockReturnValue(false)
+  })
+
+  test('it raises an error for invalid licenses in allow-licenses', async () => {
+    setInput('allow-licenses', ' BSD, GPL 2')
+    expect(() => {
+      readConfig()
+    }).toThrow('Invalid license(s) in allow-licenses: BSD, GPL 2')
+  })
+
+  test('it raises an error for invalid licenses in deny-licenses', async () => {
+    setInput('deny-licenses', ' BSD, GPL 2')
+    expect(() => {
+      readConfig()
+    }).toThrow('Invalid license(s) in deny-licenses: BSD, GPL 2')
+  })
+})

__tests__/filter.test.ts

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import {Change, Changes} from '../src/schemas'
 import {
   filterChangesBySeverity,
   filterChangesByScopes,
-  filterOutAllowedAdvisories
+  filterAllowedAdvisories
 } from '../src/filter'
 
 let npmChange: Change = {
@@ -90,28 +90,34 @@ test('it properly filters changes by scope', async () => {
   expect(result).toEqual([npmChange, rubyChange])
 })
 
+test('it properly handles undefined advisory IDs', async () => {
+  const changes = [npmChange, rubyChange, noVulnNpmChange]
+  let result = filterAllowedAdvisories(undefined, changes)
+  expect(result).toEqual([npmChange, rubyChange, noVulnNpmChange])
+})
+
 test('it properly filters changes with allowed vulnerabilities', async () => {
   const changes = [npmChange, rubyChange, noVulnNpmChange]
 
-  let result = filterOutAllowedAdvisories(['notrealGHSAID'], changes)
+  let result = filterAllowedAdvisories(['notrealGHSAID'], changes)
   expect(result).toEqual([npmChange, rubyChange, noVulnNpmChange])
 
-  result = filterOutAllowedAdvisories(['first-random_string'], changes)
+  result = filterAllowedAdvisories(['first-random_string'], changes)
   expect(result).toEqual([rubyChange, noVulnNpmChange])
 
-  result = filterOutAllowedAdvisories(
+  result = filterAllowedAdvisories(
     ['second-random_string', 'third-random_string'],
     changes
   )
   expect(result).toEqual([npmChange, noVulnNpmChange])
 
-  result = filterOutAllowedAdvisories(
+  result = filterAllowedAdvisories(
     ['first-random_string', 'second-random_string', 'third-random_string'],
     changes
   )
   expect(result).toEqual([noVulnNpmChange])
 
   // if we have a change with multiple vulnerabilities but only one is allowed, we still should not filter out that change
-  result = filterOutAllowedAdvisories(['second-random_string'], changes)
+  result = filterAllowedAdvisories(['second-random_string'], changes)
   expect(result).toEqual([npmChange, rubyChange, noVulnNpmChange])
 })

__tests__/licenses.test.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
-import {expect, test} from '@jest/globals'
+import {expect, jest, test} from '@jest/globals'
 import {Change, Changes} from '../src/schemas'
-import {getDeniedLicenseChanges} from '../src/licenses'
+
+let getInvalidLicenseChanges: Function
 
 let npmChange: Change = {
   manifest: 'package.json',
@@ -48,53 +49,153 @@ let rubyChange: Change = {
   ]
 }
 
-test('it fails if a license outside the allow list is found', async () => {
+jest.mock('@actions/core')
-  const changes: Changes = [npmChange, rubyChange]
+
-  const [invalidChanges, _] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(changes, {allow: ['BSD']})
+const mockOctokit = {
-  expect(invalidChanges[0]).toBe(npmChange)
+  rest: {
+    licenses: {
+      getForRepo: jest
+        .fn()
+        .mockReturnValue({data: {license: {spdx_id: 'AGPL'}}})
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+jest.mock('octokit', () => {
+  return {
+    Octokit: class {
+      constructor() {
+        return mockOctokit
+      }
+    }
+  }
 })
 
-test('it fails if a license inside the deny list is found', async () => {
+beforeEach(async () => {
+  jest.resetModules()
+  jest.doMock('spdx-satisfies', () => {
+    // mock spdx-satisfies return value
+    // true for BSD, false for all others
+    return jest.fn((license: string, _: string): boolean => license === 'BSD')
+  })
+  ;({getInvalidLicenseChanges} = require('../src/licenses'))
+})
+
+test('it adds license outside the allow list to forbidden changes', async () => {
   const changes: Changes = [npmChange, rubyChange]
-  const [invalidChanges] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(changes, {deny: ['BSD']})
+  const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
-  expect(invalidChanges[0]).toBe(rubyChange)
+    allow: ['BSD']
+  })
+  expect(forbidden[0]).toBe(npmChange)
+  expect(forbidden.length).toEqual(1)
+})
+
+test('it adds license inside the deny list to forbidden changes', async () => {
+  const changes: Changes = [npmChange, rubyChange]
+  const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
+    deny: ['BSD']
+  })
+  expect(forbidden[0]).toBe(rubyChange)
+  expect(forbidden.length).toEqual(1)
 })
 
 // This is more of a "here's a behavior that might be surprising" than an actual
 // thing we want in the system. Please remove this test after refactoring.
-test('it fails all license checks when allow is provided an empty array', async () => {
+test('it adds all licenses to forbidden changes when allow is provided an empty array', async () => {
   const changes: Changes = [npmChange, rubyChange]
-  let [invalidChanges, _] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(changes, {
+  let {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
     allow: [],
     deny: ['BSD']
   })
-  expect(invalidChanges.length).toBe(2)
+  expect(forbidden.length).toBe(2)
 })
 
-test('it does not fail if a license outside the allow list is found in removed changes', async () => {
+test('it does not add license outside the allow list to forbidden changes if it is in removed changes', async () => {
   const changes: Changes = [
     {...npmChange, change_type: 'removed'},
     {...rubyChange, change_type: 'removed'}
   ]
-  const [invalidChanges, _] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(changes, {allow: ['BSD']})
+  const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
-  expect(invalidChanges).toStrictEqual([])
+    allow: ['BSD']
+  })
+  expect(forbidden).toStrictEqual([])
 })
 
-test('it does not fail if a license inside the deny list is found in removed changes', async () => {
+test('it does not add license inside the deny list to forbidden changes if it is in removed changes', async () => {
   const changes: Changes = [
     {...npmChange, change_type: 'removed'},
     {...rubyChange, change_type: 'removed'}
   ]
-  const [invalidChanges, _] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(changes, {deny: ['BSD']})
+  const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
-  expect(invalidChanges).toStrictEqual([])
+    deny: ['BSD']
+  })
+  expect(forbidden).toStrictEqual([])
 })
 
-test('it fails if a license outside the allow list is found in both of added and removed changes', async () => {
+test('it adds license outside the allow list to forbidden changes if it is in both added and removed changes', async () => {
   const changes: Changes = [
     {...npmChange, change_type: 'removed'},
     npmChange,
     {...rubyChange, change_type: 'removed'}
   ]
-  const [invalidChanges, _] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(changes, {allow: ['BSD']})
+  const {forbidden} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
-  expect(invalidChanges).toStrictEqual([npmChange])
+    allow: ['BSD']
+  })
+  expect(forbidden).toStrictEqual([npmChange])
+})
+
+test('it adds all licenses to unresolved if it is unable to determine the validity', async () => {
+  jest.resetModules() // reset module set in before
+  jest.doMock('spdx-satisfies', () => {
+    return jest.fn((_first: string, _second: string) => {
+      throw new Error('Some Error')
+    })
+  })
+  ;({getInvalidLicenseChanges} = require('../src/licenses'))
+  const changes: Changes = [npmChange, rubyChange]
+  const invalidLicenses = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(changes, {
+    allow: ['BSD']
+  })
+  expect(invalidLicenses.forbidden.length).toEqual(0)
+  expect(invalidLicenses.unlicensed.length).toEqual(0)
+  expect(invalidLicenses.unresolved.length).toEqual(2)
+})
+
+describe('GH License API fallback', () => {
+  test('it calls licenses endpoint if atleast one of the changes has null license and valid source_repository_url', async () => {
+    const nullLicenseChange = {
+      ...npmChange,
+      license: null,
+      source_repository_url: 'http://github.com/some-owner/some-repo'
+    }
+    const {unlicensed} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(
+      [nullLicenseChange, rubyChange],
+      {}
+    )
+
+    expect(mockOctokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo).toHaveBeenNthCalledWith(1, {
+      owner: 'some-owner',
+      repo: 'some-repo'
+    })
+    expect(unlicensed.length).toEqual(0)
+  })
+
+  test('it does not call licenses API endpoint for change with null license and invalid source_repository_url ', async () => {
+    const {unlicensed} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(
+      [{...npmChange, license: null}],
+      {}
+    )
+    expect(mockOctokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
+    expect(unlicensed.length).toEqual(1)
+  })
+
+  test('it does not call licenses API endpoint if licenses for all changes are present', async () => {
+    const {unlicensed} = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(
+      [npmChange, rubyChange],
+      {}
+    )
+
+    expect(mockOctokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo).not.toHaveBeenCalled()
+    expect(unlicensed.length).toEqual(0)
+  })
 })

jest.config.js

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 module.exports = {
   clearMocks: true,
-  moduleFileExtensions: ['js', 'ts'],
+  moduleFileExtensions: ['js', 'json', 'ts'],
   testMatch: ['**/*.test.ts'],
   transform: {
     '^.+\\.ts$': 'ts-jest'

package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "dependency-review-action",
-  "version": "2.4.0",
+  "version": "2.5.1",
   "private": true,
   "description": "A GitHub Action for Dependency Review",
   "main": "lib/main.js",
@@ -27,24 +27,29 @@
   "dependencies": {
     "@actions/core": "^1.10.0",
     "@actions/github": "^5.1.1",
-    "@octokit/plugin-retry": "^3.0.9",
+    "@octokit/plugin-retry": "^4.0.3",
-    "@octokit/request-error": "^3.0.1",
+    "@octokit/request-error": "^3.0.2",
-    "ansi-styles": "^6.1.1",
+    "ansi-styles": "^6.2.1",
-    "got": "^12.5.1",
+    "got": "^12.5.2",
     "nodemon": "^2.0.20",
+    "octokit": "^2.0.10",
+    "spdx-expression-parse": "^3.0.1",
     "spdx-satisfies": "^5.0.1",
-    "yaml": "^2.1.2",
+    "yaml": "^2.1.3",
     "zod": "^3.19.1"
   },
   "devDependencies": {
-    "@types/node": "^16.11.63",
+    "@types/jest": "^27.5.2",
-    "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^5.38.1",
+    "@types/node": "^16.18.2",
-    "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^5.38.1",
+    "@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin": "^5.41.0",
+    "@typescript-eslint/parser": "^5.41.0",
+    "@types/spdx-expression-parse": "^3.0.2",
+    "@types/spdx-satisfies": "^0.1.0",
     "@vercel/ncc": "^0.34.0",
     "esbuild-register": "^3.3.3",
-    "eslint": "^8.24.0",
+    "eslint": "^8.26.0",
-    "eslint-plugin-github": "^4.3.7",
+    "eslint-plugin-github": "^4.4.0",
-    "eslint-plugin-jest": "^27.0.4",
+    "eslint-plugin-jest": "^27.1.3",
     "jest": "^27.5.1",
     "js-yaml": "^4.1.0",
     "nodemon": "^2.0.20",

scripts/scan_pr

@@ -3,22 +3,52 @@ require 'json'
 require 'tempfile'
 require 'open3'
 require 'bundler/inline'
+require 'optparse'
 
 gemfile do
   source 'https://rubygems.org'
   gem 'octokit'
 end
 
+config_file = nil
 github_token = ENV["GITHUB_TOKEN"]
+
 if !github_token || github_token.empty?
   puts "Please set the GITHUB_TOKEN environment variable"
   exit -1
 end
 
-arg = /(?<repo_nwo>[\w\-]+\/[\w\-]+)\/pull\/(?<pr_number>\d+)/.match(ARGV[0])
+op = OptionParser.new do |opts|
+  usage = <<EOF
+Run Dependency Review on a repository.
+
+\e[1mUsage:\e[22m
+  scripts/scan_pr [options] <pr_url>
+
+\e[1mExample:\e[22m
+  scripts/scan_pr https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/pull/294
+
+EOF
+
+  opts.banner = usage
+
+  opts.on('-c', '--config-file <FILE>', 'Use an external configuration file') do |cf|
+    config_file = cf
+  end
+
+  opts.on("-h", "--help", "Prints this help") do
+    puts opts
+    exit
+  end
+end
+
+op.parse!
+
+# make sure we have a NWO somewhere in the parameters
+arg = /(?<repo_nwo>[\w\-]+\/[\w\-]+)\/pull\/(?<pr_number>\d+)/.match(ARGV.join(" "))
 
 if arg.nil?
-  puts "Usage: script/scan_pr <pr_url>"
+  puts op
   exit -1
 end
 
@@ -33,7 +63,8 @@ event_file.write("{ \"pull_request\": #{pr.to_h.to_json}}")
 event_file.close
 
 action_inputs = {
-  "repo-token" => github_token
+  "repo-token": github_token,
+  "config-file": config_file
 }
 
 dev_cmd_env = {

src/config.ts

@@ -9,6 +9,14 @@ import {
   SeveritySchema,
   SCOPES
 } from './schemas'
+import {isSPDXValid} from './utils'
+
+type licenseKey = 'allow-licenses' | 'deny-licenses'
+
+function getOptionalBoolean(name: string): boolean | undefined {
+  const value = core.getInput(name)
+  return value.length > 0 ? core.getBooleanInput(name) : undefined
+}
 
 function getOptionalInput(name: string): string | undefined {
   const value = core.getInput(name)
@@ -23,6 +31,22 @@ function parseList(list: string | undefined): string[] | undefined {
   }
 }
 
+function validateLicenses(
+  key: licenseKey,
+  licenses: string[] | undefined
+): void {
+  if (licenses === undefined) {
+    return
+  }
+  const invalid_licenses = licenses.filter(license => !isSPDXValid(license))
+
+  if (invalid_licenses.length > 0) {
+    throw new Error(
+      `Invalid license(s) in ${key}: ${invalid_licenses.join(', ')}`
+    )
+  }
+}
+
 export function readConfig(): ConfigurationOptions {
   const externalConfig = getOptionalInput('config-file')
   if (externalConfig !== undefined) {
@@ -53,9 +77,23 @@ export function readInlineConfig(): ConfigurationOptions {
   if (allow_licenses !== undefined && deny_licenses !== undefined) {
     throw new Error("Can't specify both allow_licenses and deny_licenses")
   }
+  validateLicenses('allow-licenses', allow_licenses)
+  validateLicenses('deny-licenses', deny_licenses)
 
   const allow_ghsas = parseList(getOptionalInput('allow-ghsas'))
 
+  const license_check = z
+    .boolean()
+    .default(true)
+    .parse(getOptionalBoolean('license-check'))
+  const vulnerability_check = z
+    .boolean()
+    .default(true)
+    .parse(getOptionalBoolean('vulnerability-check'))
+  if (license_check === false && vulnerability_check === false) {
+    throw new Error("Can't disable both license-check and vulnerability-check")
+  }
+
   const base_ref = getOptionalInput('base-ref')
   const head_ref = getOptionalInput('head-ref')
 
@@ -65,6 +103,8 @@ export function readInlineConfig(): ConfigurationOptions {
     allow_licenses,
     deny_licenses,
     allow_ghsas,
+    license_check,
+    vulnerability_check,
     base_ref,
     head_ref
   }
@@ -80,8 +120,11 @@ export function readConfigFile(filePath: string): ConfigurationOptions {
   }
   data = YAML.parse(data)
 
-  // get rid of the ugly dashes from the actions conventions
   for (const key of Object.keys(data)) {
+    if (key === 'allow-licenses' || key === 'deny-licenses') {
+      validateLicenses(key, data[key])
+    }
+    // get rid of the ugly dashes from the actions conventions
     if (key.includes('-')) {
       data[key.replace(/-/g, '_')] = data[key]
       delete data[key]

src/filter.ts

@@ -51,12 +51,20 @@ export function filterChangesByScopes(
   return filteredChanges
 }
 
-export function filterOutAllowedAdvisories(
+/**
+ * Filter out changes that are allowed by the allow_ghsas config
+ * option. We want to remove these changes before we do any
+ * processing.
+ * @param ghsas - list of GHSA IDs to allow
+ * @param changes - list of changes to filter
+ * @returns a list of changes with the allowed GHSAs removed
+ */
+export function filterAllowedAdvisories(
   ghsas: string[] | undefined,
   changes: Changes
 ): Changes {
   if (ghsas === undefined) {
-    return []
+    return changes
   }
 
   const filteredChanges = changes.filter(change => {

src/licenses.ts

@@ -1,4 +1,8 @@
-import {Change} from './schemas'
+import * as core from '@actions/core'
+import spdxSatisfies from 'spdx-satisfies'
+import {Octokit} from 'octokit'
+import {Change, Changes} from './schemas'
+import {isSPDXValid} from './utils'
 
 /**
  * Loops through a list of changes, filtering and returning the
@@ -10,40 +14,164 @@ import {Change} from './schemas'
  * we will ignore the deny list.
  * @param {Change[]} changes The list of changes to filter.
  * @param { { allow?: string[], deny?: string[]}} licenses An object with `allow`/`deny` keys, each containing a list of licenses.
- * @returns {[Array<Change>, Array<Change]} A tuple where the first element is the list of denied changes and the second one is the list of changes with unknown licenses
+ * @returns {Promise<{Object.<string, Array.<Change>>}} A promise to a Record Object. The keys are strings, unlicensed, unresolved and forbidden. The values are a list of changes
  */
-export function getDeniedLicenseChanges(
+export async function getInvalidLicenseChanges(
   changes: Change[],
   licenses: {
     allow?: string[]
     deny?: string[]
   }
-): [Change[], Change[]] {
+): Promise<Record<string, Changes>> {
   const {allow, deny} = licenses
 
-  const disallowed: Change[] = []
+  const groupedChanges = await groupChanges(changes)
-  const unknown: Change[] = []
+  const licensedChanges: Changes = groupedChanges.licensed
+
+  const invalidLicenseChanges: Record<string, Changes> = {
+    unlicensed: groupedChanges.unlicensed,
+    unresolved: [],
+    forbidden: []
+  }
+
+  const validityCache = new Map<string, boolean>()
+
+  for (const change of licensedChanges) {
+    const license = change.license
+
+    // should never happen since licensedChanges always have licenses but license is nullable in changes schema
+    if (license === null) {
+      continue
+    }
+
+    if (license === 'NOASSERTION') {
+      invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed.push(change)
+    } else if (validityCache.get(license) === undefined) {
+      try {
+        if (allow !== undefined) {
+          const found = allow.find(spdxExpression =>
+            spdxSatisfies(license, spdxExpression)
+          )
+          validityCache.set(license, found !== undefined)
+        } else if (deny !== undefined) {
+          const found = deny.find(spdxExpression =>
+            spdxSatisfies(license, spdxExpression)
+          )
+          validityCache.set(license, found === undefined)
+        }
+      } catch (err) {
+        invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved.push(change)
+      }
+    }
+
+    if (validityCache.get(license) === false) {
+      invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden.push(change)
+    }
+  }
+
+  return invalidLicenseChanges
+}
+
+const fetchGHLicense = async (
+  owner: string,
+  repo: string
+): Promise<string | null> => {
+  const octokit = new Octokit({
+    auth: core.getInput('repo-token', {required: true})
+  })
+
+  try {
+    const response = await octokit.rest.licenses.getForRepo({owner, repo})
+    return response.data.license?.spdx_id ?? null
+  } catch (_) {
+    return null
+  }
+}
+
+const parseGitHubURL = (url: string): {owner: string; repo: string} | null => {
+  try {
+    const parsed = new URL(url)
+    if (parsed.host !== 'github.com') {
+      return null
+    }
+    const components = parsed.pathname.split('/')
+    if (components.length < 3) {
+      return null
+    }
+    return {owner: components[1], repo: components[2]}
+  } catch (_) {
+    return null
+  }
+}
+
+const setGHLicenses = async (changes: Change[]): Promise<Change[]> => {
+  const updatedChanges = changes.map(async change => {
+    if (change.license !== null || change.source_repository_url === null) {
+      return change
+    }
+
+    const githubUrl = parseGitHubURL(change.source_repository_url)
+
+    if (githubUrl === null) {
+      return change
+    }
+
+    return {
+      ...change,
+      license: await fetchGHLicense(githubUrl.owner, githubUrl.repo)
+    }
+  })
+
+  return Promise.all(updatedChanges)
+}
+// Currently Dependency Graph licenses are truncated to 255 characters
+// This possibly makes them invalid spdx ids
+const truncatedDGLicense = (license: string): boolean =>
+  license.length === 255 && !isSPDXValid(license)
+
+async function groupChanges(
+  changes: Changes
+): Promise<Record<string, Changes>> {
+  const result: Record<string, Changes> = {
+    licensed: [],
+    unlicensed: []
+  }
+
+  const ghChanges = []
 
   for (const change of changes) {
     if (change.change_type === 'removed') {
       continue
     }
 
-    const license = change.license
+    if (change.license === null) {
-    if (license === null) {
+      if (change.source_repository_url !== null) {
-      unknown.push(change)
+        ghChanges.push(change)
-      continue
+      } else {
-    }
+        result.unlicensed.push(change)
-    if (allow !== undefined) {
-      if (!allow.includes(license)) {
-        disallowed.push(change)
       }
-    } else if (deny !== undefined) {
+    } else {
-      if (deny.includes(license)) {
+      if (
-        disallowed.push(change)
+        truncatedDGLicense(change.license) &&
+        change.source_repository_url !== null
+      ) {
+        ghChanges.push(change)
+      } else {
+        result.licensed.push(change)
       }
     }
   }
 
-  return [disallowed, unknown]
+  if (ghChanges.length > 0) {
+    const ghLicenses = await setGHLicenses(ghChanges)
+    for (const change of ghLicenses) {
+      if (change.license === null) {
+        result.unlicensed.push(change)
+      } else {
+        result.licensed.push(change)
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  return result
 }

src/main.ts

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ import {readConfig} from '../src/config'
 import {
   filterChangesBySeverity,
   filterChangesByScopes,
-  filterOutAllowedAdvisories
+  filterAllowedAdvisories
 } from '../src/filter'
-import {getDeniedLicenseChanges} from './licenses'
+import {getInvalidLicenseChanges} from './licenses'
 import * as summary from './summary'
 import {getRefs} from './git-refs'
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
 
     const minSeverity = config.fail_on_severity as Severity
     const scopedChanges = filterChangesByScopes(config.fail_on_scopes, changes)
-    const filteredChanges = filterOutAllowedAdvisories(
+    const filteredChanges = filterAllowedAdvisories(
       config.allow_ghsas,
       scopedChanges
     )
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
         change.vulnerabilities.length > 0
     )
 
-    const [licenseErrors, unknownLicenses] = getDeniedLicenseChanges(
+    const invalidLicenseChanges = await getInvalidLicenseChanges(
       filteredChanges,
       {
         allow: config.allow_licenses,
@@ -53,13 +53,21 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
       }
     )
 
-    summary.addSummaryToSummary(addedChanges, licenseErrors, unknownLicenses)
+    summary.addSummaryToSummary(
-    summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(addedChanges, minSeverity)
+      config.vulnerability_check ? addedChanges : null,
-    summary.addLicensesToSummary(licenseErrors, unknownLicenses, config)
+      config.license_check ? invalidLicenseChanges : null
-    summary.addScannedDependencies(changes)
+    )
 
-    printVulnerabilitiesBlock(addedChanges, minSeverity)
+    if (config.vulnerability_check) {
-    printLicensesBlock(licenseErrors, unknownLicenses)
+      summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(addedChanges, minSeverity)
+      printVulnerabilitiesBlock(addedChanges, minSeverity)
+    }
+    if (config.license_check) {
+      summary.addLicensesToSummary(invalidLicenseChanges, config)
+      printLicensesBlock(invalidLicenseChanges)
+    }
+
+    summary.addScannedDependencies(changes)
     printScannedDependencies(changes)
   } catch (error) {
     if (error instanceof RequestError && error.status === 404) {
@@ -83,7 +91,7 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
 }
 
 function printVulnerabilitiesBlock(
-  addedChanges: Change[],
+  addedChanges: Changes,
   minSeverity: Severity
 ): void {
   let failed = false
@@ -119,24 +127,28 @@ function printChangeVulnerabilities(change: Change): void {
 }
 
 function printLicensesBlock(
-  licenseErrors: Change[],
+  invalidLicenseChanges: Record<string, Changes>
-  unknownLicenses: Change[]
 ): void {
   core.group('Licenses', async () => {
-    if (licenseErrors.length > 0) {
+    if (invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden.length > 0) {
-      printLicensesError(licenseErrors)
+      core.info('\nThe following dependencies have incompatible licenses:')
+      printLicensesError(invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden)
       core.setFailed('Dependency review detected incompatible licenses.')
     }
-    printNullLicenses(unknownLicenses)
+    if (invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved.length > 0) {
+      core.warning(
+        '\nThe validity of the licenses of the dependencies below could not be determined. Ensure that they are valid SPDX licenses:'
+      )
+      printLicensesError(invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved)
+      core.setFailed(
+        'Dependency review could not detect the validity of all licenses.'
+      )
+    }
+    printNullLicenses(invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed)
   })
 }
 
-function printLicensesError(changes: Change[]): void {
+function printLicensesError(changes: Changes): void {
-  if (changes.length === 0) {
-    return
-  }
-
-  core.info('\nThe following dependencies have incompatible licenses:\n')
   for (const change of changes) {
     core.info(
       `${styles.bold.open}${change.manifest} » ${change.name}@${change.version}${styles.bold.close} – License: ${styles.color.red.open}${change.license}${styles.color.red.close}`
@@ -144,12 +156,12 @@ function printLicensesError(changes: Change[]): void {
   }
 }
 
-function printNullLicenses(changes: Change[]): void {
+function printNullLicenses(changes: Changes): void {
   if (changes.length === 0) {
     return
   }
 
-  core.info('\nWe could not detect a license for the following dependencies:\n')
+  core.info('\nWe could not detect a license for the following dependencies:')
   for (const change of changes) {
     core.info(
       `${styles.bold.open}${change.manifest} » ${change.name}@${change.version}${styles.bold.close}`
@@ -192,7 +204,7 @@ function renderScannedDependency(change: Change): string {
     } as const
   )[changeType]
 
-  return `${styles.color[color].open}${icon} ${change.manifest}@${change.version}${styles.color[color].close}`
+  return `${styles.color[color].open}${icon} ${change.name}@${change.version}${styles.color[color].close}`
 }
 
 function printScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {

src/schemas.ts

@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ export const ConfigurationOptionsSchema = z
     allow_licenses: z.array(z.string()).default([]),
     deny_licenses: z.array(z.string()).default([]),
     allow_ghsas: z.array(z.string()).default([]),
+    license_check: z.boolean().default(true),
+    vulnerability_check: z.boolean().default(true),
     config_file: z.string().optional().default('false'),
     base_ref: z.string(),
     head_ref: z.string()

src/summary.ts

@@ -1,18 +1,27 @@
 import * as core from '@actions/core'
-import {ConfigurationOptions, Change, Changes} from './schemas'
+import {ConfigurationOptions, Changes} from './schemas'
 import {SummaryTableRow} from '@actions/core/lib/summary'
 import {groupDependenciesByManifest, getManifestsSet, renderUrl} from './utils'
 
 export function addSummaryToSummary(
-  addedPackages: Changes,
+  addedPackages: Changes | null,
-  licenseErrors: Change[],
+  invalidLicenseChanges: Record<string, Changes> | null
-  unknownLicenses: Change[]
 ): void {
   core.summary
     .addHeading('Dependency Review')
-    .addRaw(
+    .addRaw('We found:')
-      `We found ${addedPackages.length} vulnerable package(s), ${licenseErrors.length} package(s) with incompatible licenses, and ${unknownLicenses.length} package(s) with unknown licenses.`
+    .addList([
-    )
+      ...(addedPackages
+        ? [`${addedPackages.length} vulnerable package(s)`]
+        : []),
+      ...(invalidLicenseChanges
+        ? [
+            `${invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved.length} package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions`,
+            `${invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden.length} package(s) with incompatible licenses`,
+            `${invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed.length} package(s) with unknown licenses.`
+          ]
+        : [])
+    ])
 }
 
 export function addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(
@@ -76,8 +85,7 @@ export function addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(
 }
 
 export function addLicensesToSummary(
-  licenseErrors: Change[],
+  invalidLicenseChanges: Record<string, Changes>,
-  unknownLicenses: Change[],
   config: ConfigurationOptions
 ): void {
   core.summary.addHeading('Licenses')
@@ -93,62 +101,59 @@ export function addLicensesToSummary(
     )
   }
 
-  if (licenseErrors.length === 0 && unknownLicenses.length === 0) {
+  if (Object.values(invalidLicenseChanges).every(item => item.length === 0)) {
     core.summary.addQuote('No license violations detected.')
     return
   }
 
-  if (licenseErrors.length > 0) {
+  core.debug(
-    const rows: SummaryTableRow[] = []
+    `found ${invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed.length} unknown licenses`
-    const manifests = getManifestsSet(licenseErrors)
+  )
 
-    core.summary.addHeading('Incompatible Licenses', 3).addSeparator()
+  core.debug(
+    `${invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved.length} licenses could not be validated`
+  )
+
+  printLicenseViolation(
+    'Incompatible Licenses',
+    invalidLicenseChanges.forbidden
+  )
+  printLicenseViolation('Unknown Licenses', invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed)
+  printLicenseViolation(
+    'Invalid SPDX License Definitions',
+    invalidLicenseChanges.unresolved
+  )
+}
+function printLicenseViolation(heading: string, changes: Changes): void {
+  core.summary.addHeading(heading, 5).addSeparator()
+
+  if (changes.length > 0) {
+    const rows: SummaryTableRow[] = []
+    const manifests = getManifestsSet(changes)
 
     for (const manifest of manifests) {
       core.summary.addHeading(`<em>${manifest}</em>`, 4)
 
-      for (const change of licenseErrors.filter(
+      for (const change of changes.filter(pkg => pkg.manifest === manifest)) {
-        pkg => pkg.manifest === manifest
-      )) {
         rows.push([
           renderUrl(change.source_repository_url, change.name),
           change.version,
-          change.license || ''
+          formatLicense(change.license)
         ])
       }
+
       core.summary.addTable([['Package', 'Version', 'License'], ...rows])
     }
   } else {
-    core.summary.addQuote('No license violations detected.')
+    core.summary.addQuote(`No ${heading.toLowerCase()} detected.`)
   }
+}
 
-  core.debug(`found ${unknownLicenses.length} unknown licenses`)
+function formatLicense(license: string | null): string {
-
+  if (license === null || license === 'NOASSERTION') {
-  if (unknownLicenses.length > 0) {
+    return 'Null'
-    const rows: SummaryTableRow[] = []
-    const manifests = getManifestsSet(unknownLicenses)
-
-    core.debug(
-      `found ${manifests.entries.length} manifests for unknown licenses`
-    )
-
-    core.summary.addHeading('Unknown Licenses', 3).addSeparator()
-
-    for (const manifest of manifests) {
-      core.summary.addHeading(`<em>${manifest}</em>`, 4)
-
-      for (const change of unknownLicenses.filter(
-        pkg => pkg.manifest === manifest
-      )) {
-        rows.push([
-          renderUrl(change.source_repository_url, change.name),
-          change.version
-        ])
-      }
-
-      core.summary.addTable([['Package', 'Version'], ...rows])
-    }
   }
+  return license
 }
 
 export function addScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {
@@ -157,7 +162,7 @@ export function addScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {
 
   const summary = core.summary
     .addHeading('Scanned Dependencies')
-    .addRaw(`We scanned ${dependencies.size} manifest files:`)
+    .addHeading(`We scanned ${dependencies.size} manifest files:`, 5)
 
   for (const manifest of manifests) {
     const deps = dependencies.get(manifest)
@@ -165,7 +170,7 @@ export function addScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {
       const dependencyNames = deps.map(
         dependency => `<li>${dependency.name}@${dependency.version}</li>`
       )
-      summary.addRaw(`<h3>${manifest}</h3><ul>${dependencyNames.join('')}</ul>`)
+      summary.addDetails(manifest, `<ul>${dependencyNames.join('')}</ul>`)
     }
   }
 }

src/utils.ts

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+import spdxParse from 'spdx-expression-parse'
 import {Changes} from './schemas'
 
 export function groupDependenciesByManifest(
@@ -28,3 +29,12 @@ export function renderUrl(url: string | null, text: string): string {
     return text
   }
 }
+
+export function isSPDXValid(license: string): boolean {
+  try {
+    spdxParse(license)
+    return true
+  } catch (_) {
+    return false
+  }
+}