add new parameter warn_only
This commit is contained in:
+32
-2
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import * as core from '@actions/core'
|
||||
import * as z from 'zod'
|
||||
import {ConfigurationOptions, ConfigurationOptionsSchema} from './schemas'
|
||||
import {isSPDXValid, octokitClient} from './utils'
|
||||
import {PackageURL} from 'packageurl-js'
|
||||
|
||||
type ConfigurationOptionsPartial = Partial<ConfigurationOptions>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -29,13 +30,18 @@ function readInlineConfig(): ConfigurationOptionsPartial {
|
||||
const fail_on_scopes = parseList(getOptionalInput('fail-on-scopes'))
|
||||
const allow_licenses = parseList(getOptionalInput('allow-licenses'))
|
||||
const deny_licenses = parseList(getOptionalInput('deny-licenses'))
|
||||
const allow_dependencies_licenses = parseList(
|
||||
getOptionalInput('allow-dependencies-licenses')
|
||||
)
|
||||
const allow_ghsas = parseList(getOptionalInput('allow-ghsas'))
|
||||
const license_check = getOptionalBoolean('license-check')
|
||||
const vulnerability_check = getOptionalBoolean('vulnerability-check')
|
||||
const base_ref = getOptionalInput('base-ref')
|
||||
const head_ref = getOptionalInput('head-ref')
|
||||
const comment_summary_in_pr = getOptionalBoolean('comment-summary-in-pr')
|
||||
const warn_only = getOptionalBoolean('comment-summary-in-pr')
|
||||
|
||||
validatePURL(allow_dependencies_licenses)
|
||||
validateLicenses('allow-licenses', allow_licenses)
|
||||
validateLicenses('deny-licenses', deny_licenses)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -44,12 +50,14 @@ function readInlineConfig(): ConfigurationOptionsPartial {
|
||||
fail_on_scopes,
|
||||
allow_licenses,
|
||||
deny_licenses,
|
||||
allow_dependencies_licenses,
|
||||
allow_ghsas,
|
||||
license_check,
|
||||
vulnerability_check,
|
||||
base_ref,
|
||||
head_ref,
|
||||
comment_summary_in_pr
|
||||
comment_summary_in_pr,
|
||||
warn_only
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return Object.fromEntries(
|
||||
@@ -130,7 +138,8 @@ function parseConfigFile(configData: string): ConfigurationOptionsPartial {
|
||||
'allow-licenses',
|
||||
'deny-licenses',
|
||||
'fail-on-scopes',
|
||||
'allow-ghsas'
|
||||
'allow-ghsas',
|
||||
'allow-dependencies-licenses'
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for (const key of Object.keys(data)) {
|
||||
@@ -149,6 +158,11 @@ function parseConfigFile(configData: string): ConfigurationOptionsPartial {
|
||||
validateLicenses(key, data[key])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// validate purls from the allow-dependencies-licenses
|
||||
if (key === 'allow-dependencies-licenses') {
|
||||
validatePURL(data[key])
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// get rid of the ugly dashes from the actions conventions
|
||||
if (key.includes('-')) {
|
||||
data[key.replace(/-/g, '_')] = data[key]
|
||||
@@ -187,3 +201,19 @@ async function getRemoteConfig(configOpts: {
|
||||
throw new Error('Error fetching remote config file')
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
function validatePURL(allow_dependencies_licenses: string[] | undefined): void {
|
||||
//validate that the provided elements of the string are in valid purl format
|
||||
if (allow_dependencies_licenses === undefined) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
const invalid_purls = allow_dependencies_licenses.filter(
|
||||
purl => !PackageURL.fromString(purl)
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if (invalid_purls.length > 0) {
|
||||
throw new Error(
|
||||
`Invalid purl(s) in allow-dependencies-licenses: ${invalid_purls}`
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+26
-4
@@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
|
||||
import * as core from '@actions/core'
|
||||
import * as githubUtils from '@actions/github/lib/utils'
|
||||
import * as retry from '@octokit/plugin-retry'
|
||||
import {Changes, ChangesSchema} from './schemas'
|
||||
import {
|
||||
ChangesSchema,
|
||||
ComparisonResponse,
|
||||
ComparisonResponseSchema
|
||||
} from './schemas'
|
||||
|
||||
const retryingOctokit = githubUtils.GitHub.plugin(retry.retry)
|
||||
const SnapshotWarningsHeader = 'x-github-dependency-graph-snapshot-warnings'
|
||||
const octo = new retryingOctokit(
|
||||
githubUtils.getOctokitOptions(core.getInput('repo-token', {required: true}))
|
||||
)
|
||||
@@ -18,14 +23,31 @@ export async function compare({
|
||||
repo: string
|
||||
baseRef: string
|
||||
headRef: string
|
||||
}): Promise<Changes> {
|
||||
}): Promise<ComparisonResponse> {
|
||||
let snapshot_warnings = ''
|
||||
const changes = await octo.paginate(
|
||||
'GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependency-graph/compare/{basehead}',
|
||||
{
|
||||
method: 'GET',
|
||||
url: '/repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependency-graph/compare/{basehead}',
|
||||
owner,
|
||||
repo,
|
||||
basehead: `${baseRef}...${headRef}`
|
||||
},
|
||||
response => {
|
||||
if (
|
||||
response.headers[SnapshotWarningsHeader] &&
|
||||
typeof response.headers[SnapshotWarningsHeader] === 'string'
|
||||
) {
|
||||
snapshot_warnings = Buffer.from(
|
||||
response.headers[SnapshotWarningsHeader],
|
||||
'base64'
|
||||
).toString('utf-8')
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ChangesSchema.parse(response.data)
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
return ChangesSchema.parse(changes)
|
||||
return ComparisonResponseSchema.parse({
|
||||
changes,
|
||||
snapshot_warnings
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
+36
-1
@@ -1,17 +1,19 @@
|
||||
import spdxSatisfies from 'spdx-satisfies'
|
||||
import {Change, Changes} from './schemas'
|
||||
import {isSPDXValid, octokitClient} from './utils'
|
||||
import {PackageURL} from 'packageurl-js'
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Loops through a list of changes, filtering and returning the
|
||||
* ones that don't conform to the licenses allow/deny lists.
|
||||
* It will also filter out the changes which are defined in the licenseExclusions list.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Keep in mind that we don't let users specify both an allow and a deny
|
||||
* list in their config files, so this code works under the assumption that
|
||||
* one of the two list parameters will be empty. If both lists are provided,
|
||||
* we will ignore the deny list.
|
||||
* @param {Change[]} changes The list of changes to filter.
|
||||
* @param { { allow?: string[], deny?: string[]}} licenses An object with `allow`/`deny` keys, each containing a list of licenses.
|
||||
* @param { { allow?: string[], deny?: string[], licenseExclusions?: string[]}} licenses An object with `allow`/`deny`/`licenseExclusions` keys, each containing a list of licenses.
|
||||
* @returns {Promise<{Object.<string, Array.<Change>>}} A promise to a Record Object. The keys are strings, unlicensed, unresolved and forbidden. The values are a list of changes
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export type InvalidLicenseChangeTypes =
|
||||
@@ -24,11 +26,44 @@ export async function getInvalidLicenseChanges(
|
||||
licenses: {
|
||||
allow?: string[]
|
||||
deny?: string[]
|
||||
licenseExclusions?: string[]
|
||||
}
|
||||
): Promise<InvalidLicenseChanges> {
|
||||
const {allow, deny} = licenses
|
||||
const licenseExclusions = licenses.licenseExclusions?.map(
|
||||
(pkgUrl: string) => {
|
||||
return PackageURL.fromString(pkgUrl)
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
const groupedChanges = await groupChanges(changes)
|
||||
|
||||
// Takes the changes from the groupedChanges object and filters out the ones that are part of the exclusions list
|
||||
// It does by creating a new PackageURL object from the change and comparing it to the exclusions list
|
||||
groupedChanges.licensed = groupedChanges.licensed.filter(change => {
|
||||
if (change.package_url.length === 0) {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const changeAsPackageURL = PackageURL.fromString(change.package_url)
|
||||
|
||||
// We want to find if the licenseExclussion list contains the PackageURL of the Change
|
||||
// If it does, we want to filter it out and therefore return false
|
||||
// If it doesn't, we want to keep it and therefore return true
|
||||
if (
|
||||
licenseExclusions !== null &&
|
||||
licenseExclusions !== undefined &&
|
||||
licenseExclusions.findIndex(
|
||||
exclusion =>
|
||||
exclusion.type === changeAsPackageURL.type &&
|
||||
exclusion.name === changeAsPackageURL.name
|
||||
) !== -1
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return false
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
const licensedChanges: Changes = groupedChanges.licensed
|
||||
|
||||
const invalidLicenseChanges: InvalidLicenseChanges = {
|
||||
|
||||
+14
-5
@@ -16,28 +16,32 @@ import {getRefs} from './git-refs'
|
||||
|
||||
import {groupDependenciesByManifest} from './utils'
|
||||
import {commentPr} from './comment-pr'
|
||||
import { warn } from 'console'
|
||||
|
||||
async function run(): Promise<void> {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
const config = await readConfig()
|
||||
|
||||
const refs = getRefs(config, github.context)
|
||||
|
||||
const changes = await dependencyGraph.compare({
|
||||
const comparison = await dependencyGraph.compare({
|
||||
owner: github.context.repo.owner,
|
||||
repo: github.context.repo.repo,
|
||||
baseRef: refs.base,
|
||||
headRef: refs.head
|
||||
})
|
||||
const changes = comparison.changes
|
||||
const snapshot_warnings = comparison.snapshot_warnings
|
||||
|
||||
if (!changes) {
|
||||
core.info('No Dependency Changes found. Skipping Dependency Review.')
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
// config.fail_on_severity
|
||||
config.fail_on_severity
|
||||
const failOnSeverityParams = config.fail_on_severity
|
||||
const failOnVulnerability = config.fail_on_severity !== 'none'
|
||||
const failOnVulnerability = !config.warn_only // if warn only is true the system should not fail on vulnerabilities
|
||||
let minSeverity: Severity = 'low'
|
||||
if (failOnSeverityParams !== 'none') {
|
||||
if (failOnSeverityParams) {
|
||||
minSeverity = failOnSeverityParams
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -61,7 +65,8 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
|
||||
filteredChanges,
|
||||
{
|
||||
allow: config.allow_licenses,
|
||||
deny: config.deny_licenses
|
||||
deny: config.deny_licenses,
|
||||
licenseExclusions: config.allow_dependencies_licenses
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -71,6 +76,10 @@ async function run(): Promise<void> {
|
||||
config
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
if (snapshot_warnings) {
|
||||
summary.addSnapshotWarnings(snapshot_warnings)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (config.vulnerability_check) {
|
||||
summary.addChangeVulnerabilitiesToSummary(vulnerableChanges, minSeverity)
|
||||
printVulnerabilitiesBlock(
|
||||
|
||||
+9
-3
@@ -4,8 +4,7 @@ export const FAIL_ON_SEVERITIES = [
|
||||
'critical',
|
||||
'high',
|
||||
'moderate',
|
||||
'low',
|
||||
'none'
|
||||
'low'
|
||||
] as const
|
||||
export const SEVERITIES = ['critical', 'high', 'moderate', 'low'] as const
|
||||
export const SCOPES = ['unknown', 'runtime', 'development'] as const
|
||||
@@ -48,13 +47,15 @@ export const ConfigurationOptionsSchema = z
|
||||
fail_on_scopes: z.array(z.enum(SCOPES)).default(['runtime']),
|
||||
allow_licenses: z.array(z.string()).optional(),
|
||||
deny_licenses: z.array(z.string()).optional(),
|
||||
allow_dependencies_licenses: z.array(z.string()).optional(),
|
||||
allow_ghsas: z.array(z.string()).default([]),
|
||||
license_check: z.boolean().default(true),
|
||||
vulnerability_check: z.boolean().default(true),
|
||||
config_file: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
base_ref: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
head_ref: z.string().optional(),
|
||||
comment_summary_in_pr: z.boolean().default(false)
|
||||
comment_summary_in_pr: z.boolean().default(false),
|
||||
warn_only: z.boolean().default(false)
|
||||
})
|
||||
.superRefine((config, context) => {
|
||||
if (config.allow_licenses && config.deny_licenses) {
|
||||
@@ -81,9 +82,14 @@ export const ConfigurationOptionsSchema = z
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
export const ChangesSchema = z.array(ChangeSchema)
|
||||
export const ComparisonResponseSchema = z.object({
|
||||
changes: z.array(ChangeSchema),
|
||||
snapshot_warnings: z.string()
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
export type Change = z.infer<typeof ChangeSchema>
|
||||
export type Changes = z.infer<typeof ChangesSchema>
|
||||
export type ComparisonResponse = z.infer<typeof ComparisonResponseSchema>
|
||||
export type ConfigurationOptions = z.infer<typeof ConfigurationOptionsSchema>
|
||||
export type FailOnSeverity = z.infer<typeof FailOnSeveritySchema>
|
||||
export type Severity = z.infer<typeof SeveritySchema>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -143,6 +143,13 @@ export function addLicensesToSummary(
|
||||
`<strong>Denied Licenses</strong>: ${config.deny_licenses.join(', ')}`
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (config.allow_dependencies_licenses) {
|
||||
core.summary.addQuote(
|
||||
`<strong>Excluded from license check</strong>: ${config.allow_dependencies_licenses.join(
|
||||
', '
|
||||
)}`
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
core.debug(
|
||||
`found ${invalidLicenseChanges.unlicensed.length} unknown licenses`
|
||||
@@ -215,6 +222,23 @@ export function addScannedDependencies(changes: Changes): void {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function addSnapshotWarnings(warnings: string): void {
|
||||
// For now, we want to ignore warnings that just complain
|
||||
// about missing snapshots on the head SHA. This is a product
|
||||
// decision to avoid presenting warnings to users who simply
|
||||
// don't use snapshots.
|
||||
const ignore_regex = new RegExp(/No.*snapshot.*found.*head.*/, 'i')
|
||||
if (ignore_regex.test(warnings)) {
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
core.summary.addHeading('Snapshot Warnings', 2)
|
||||
core.summary.addQuote(`${icons.warning}: ${warnings}`)
|
||||
core.summary.addRaw(
|
||||
'Re-running this action after a short time may resolve the issue. See the documentation for more information and troubleshooting advice.'
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function countLicenseIssues(
|
||||
invalidLicenseChanges: InvalidLicenseChanges
|
||||
): number {
|
||||
|
||||
+3
-1
@@ -8,7 +8,9 @@ export function groupDependenciesByManifest(
|
||||
): Map<string, Changes> {
|
||||
const dependencies: Map<string, Changes> = new Map()
|
||||
for (const change of changes) {
|
||||
const manifestName = change.manifest
|
||||
// If the manifest is null or empty, give it a name now to avoid
|
||||
// breaking the HTML rendering later
|
||||
const manifestName = change.manifest || 'Unnamed Manifest'
|
||||
|
||||
if (dependencies.get(manifestName) === undefined) {
|
||||
dependencies.set(manifestName, [])
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user